Rudmik Luke, Soler Zachary M, Mace Jess C, DeConde Adam S, Schlosser Rodney J, Smith Timothy L
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Laryngoscope. 2015 Jul;125(7):1517-22. doi: 10.1002/lary.25108. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study is to improve patient understanding of surgical outcomes while they make a preference-sensitive decision regarding electing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).
Prospective observational cohort study.
Patients with CRS who elected ESS were prospectively enrolled into a multi-institutional, observational cohort study. Patients' were categorized into 10 preoperative Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) groups based on 10-point increments beginning with a score of 10 and ending at 110. The proportion of patients achieving a SNOT-22 minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (9 points) and the percentage of relative improvement (%) for each preoperative SNOT-22 group were calculated. A subgroup analysis based on polyp status was performed.
A total of 327 patients were included in this study. Patients with a SNOT-22 score between 10 and 19 had the lowest chance of achieving an MCID (37.5%) and received a relative mean worsening of their quality of life (QoL) after ESS (+18.8%). Patients with a SNOT-22 score greater than 30 obtained a greater than 75% chance of achieving an MCID, and there was a relative improvement of 45% in QoL (all < -44.9%) after ESS. Outcomes from the polyp status subgroup analysis were similar to the findings from the overall cohort.
Outcomes from this study suggest that patients with a preoperative SNOT-22 score higher than 30 points receive a greater than 75% chance of achieving an MCID and on average obtain a 45% relative improvement in their QoL after ESS. Patients with SNOT-22 score of less than 20 did not experience improved QoL from ESS.
目的/假设:本研究的目的是在患者就慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)选择内镜鼻窦手术(ESS)做出偏好敏感决策时,提高他们对手术结果的理解。
前瞻性观察队列研究。
选择ESS的CRS患者前瞻性纳入一项多机构观察队列研究。患者根据10分递增幅度分为10个术前鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-22)组,分数从10分开始,到110分结束。计算达到SNOT-22最小临床重要差异(MCID)(9分)的患者比例以及每个术前SNOT-22组的相对改善百分比(%)。进行了基于息肉状态的亚组分析。
本研究共纳入327例患者。SNOT-22评分为10至19分的患者达到MCID的机会最低(37.5%),并且在ESS后其生活质量(QoL)平均相对恶化(+18.8%)。SNOT-22评分大于30分的患者达到MCID的机会大于75%,并且在ESS后QoL相对改善45%(均< -44.9%)。息肉状态亚组分析的结果与整个队列的结果相似。
本研究结果表明,术前SNOT-22评分高于30分的患者达到MCID的机会大于75%,并且在ESS后其QoL平均相对改善45%。SNOT-22评分低于20分的患者并未从ESS中获得QoL的改善。