• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[复杂问题的还原论方法:一种认识论与伦理学反思]

[Reductionist approaches of complex problems: an epistemological and ethical reflection].

作者信息

Rivera Silvia

机构信息

Área de Ética en Pediatría Ambulatoria de la SAP.

出版信息

Vertex. 2014 Jul-Aug;25(116):308-14.

PMID:25546646
Abstract

Reductionism is a constitutive feature of the "standard view" or inherited conception in philosophy of science, such as Enrique Marí says in his book "Elements of comparative epistemology". Whereas the "standard view" is one of the articulators of scientism - epistemological hegemonic position in the contexts of education, innovation, evaluation and application of techno-scientific knowledge - imposed an analysis of this concept as a necessary condition for its overcoming. This article intends to define the meaning and scope of the epistemological reductionism within the framework of the biomedical sciences, on the basis of their genealogy, and then moving in the explicitation of the multiple ways that invest for, finally, realize the consequences of his naive acceptance - or perhaps downright accomplice, of a great part of the scientific community. The consequences are presented in the field of theory, but very particularly in the field of praxis. Establishing the ethical implications of the epistemological reductionism in the theory and practice of Biomedical Sciences is the objective of this work.

摘要

还原论是科学哲学中“标准观点”或传统观念的一个构成性特征,正如恩里克·马里在其《比较认识论原理》一书中所说。而“标准观点”是科学主义的阐释者之一——在技术科学知识的教育、创新、评估和应用背景下的认识论霸权地位——将对这一概念的分析作为克服它的必要条件。本文旨在基于生物医学科学的谱系,在生物医学科学框架内界定认识论还原论的含义和范围,然后阐述其投入的多种方式,最终揭示科学界很大一部分人天真接受——甚至可能是完全同谋——它所带来的后果。这些后果在理论领域有所呈现,但在实践领域尤为突出。确定认识论还原论在生物医学科学理论与实践中的伦理含义是这项工作的目标。

相似文献

1
[Reductionist approaches of complex problems: an epistemological and ethical reflection].[复杂问题的还原论方法:一种认识论与伦理学反思]
Vertex. 2014 Jul-Aug;25(116):308-14.
2
[Aware and cooperative reduction].[清醒且配合下复位]
Clin Ter. 2012;163(3):e133-43.
3
Science, practice and mythology: a definition and examination of the implications of scientism in medicine.科学、实践与神话:科学主义在医学中的定义与影响探讨。
Health Care Anal. 2013 Jun;21(2):130-45. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0211-6.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
Habermasian knowledge interests: epistemological implications for health sciences.哈贝马斯的知识兴趣:对健康科学的认识论影响
Nurs Philos. 2015 Apr;16(2):77-86. doi: 10.1111/nup.12080. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
6
Reductionism in the pursuit of nursing science: (in)congruent with nursing's core values?护理科学追求中的还原论:与护理的核心价值观(不)一致?
Can J Nurs Res. 2000 Sep;32(2):75-88.
7
On the Science of Consciousness: Epistemological Reflections and Clinical Implications.论意识科学:认识论反思与临床意义
Explore (NY). 2017 May-Jun;13(3):163-180. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
8
The value of public health research and the division between basic vs. applied science.
Braz J Infect Dis. 2003 Feb;7(1):82-90. doi: 10.1590/s1413-86702003000100010. Epub 2003 Dec 2.
9
On the normativity of human nature: some epistemological remarks.论人性的规范性:一些认识论评论
J Med Philos. 2003 Apr;28(2):239-54. doi: 10.1076/jmep.28.2.239.14209.
10
[When science becomes technology: epistemological and ethical consequences of the Adduction].当科学成为技术:归纳法的认识论和伦理后果
Clin Ter. 2015;166(1):9-11. doi: 10.7417/CT.2015.1799.