Suppr超能文献

一刀切并不适用于所有情况:对加拿大萨斯喀彻温省实施“释放护理时间:高效病房™”过程中现有质量改进能力的重要性进行的定性内容分析。

One size does not fit all: a qualitative content analysis of the importance of existing quality improvement capacity in the implementation of Releasing Time to Care: the Productive Ward™ in Saskatchewan, Canada.

作者信息

Hamilton Jessica, Verrall Tanya, Maben Jill, Griffiths Peter, Avis Kyla, Baker G Ross, Teare Gary

机构信息

Health Quality Council, Saskatchewan, 241-111 Research Drive, Saskatoon S7N 3R2, Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 19;14:642. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0642-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Releasing Time to Care: The Productive Ward™ (RTC) is a method for conducting continuous quality improvement (QI). The Saskatchewan Ministry of Health mandated its implementation in Saskatchewan, Canada between 2008 and 2012. Subsequently, a research team was developed to evaluate its impact on the nursing unit environment. We sought to explore the influence of the unit's existing QI capacity on their ability to engage with RTC as a program for continuous QI.

METHODS

We conducted interviews with staff from 8 nursing units and asked them to speak about their experience doing RTC. Using qualitative content analysis, and guided by the Organizing for Quality framework, we describe the existing QI capacity and impact of RTC on the unit environment.

RESULTS

The results focus on 2 units chosen to highlight extreme variation in existing QI capacity. Unit B was characterized by a strong existing environment. RTC was implemented in an environment with a motivated manager and collaborative culture. Aided by the structural support provided by the organization, the QI capacity on this unit was strengthened through RTC. Staff recognized the potential of using the RTC processes to support QI work. Staff on unit E did not have the same experience with RTC. Like unit B, they had similar structural supports provided by their organization but they did not have the same existing cultural or political environment to facilitate the implementation of RTC. They did not have internal motivation and felt they were only doing RTC because they had to. Though they had some success with RTC activities, the staff did not have the same understanding of the methods that RTC could provide for continuous QI work.

CONCLUSIONS

RTC has the potential to be a strong tool for engaging units to do QI. This occurs best when RTC is implemented in a supporting environment. One size does not fit all and administrative bodies must consider the unique context of each environment prior to implementing large-scale QI projects. Use of an established framework, like Organizing for Quality, could highlight the distinctive supports needed in particular care environments to increase the likelihood of successful engagement.

摘要

背景

释放护理时间:高效病房™(RTC)是一种进行持续质量改进(QI)的方法。加拿大萨斯喀彻温省卫生部在2008年至2012年期间强制要求在该省实施。随后,成立了一个研究团队来评估其对护理单元环境的影响。我们试图探讨护理单元现有的质量改进能力对其参与RTC作为持续质量改进项目的能力的影响。

方法

我们对8个护理单元的工作人员进行了访谈,询问他们开展RTC的经历。采用定性内容分析法,并以质量组织框架为指导,我们描述了现有的质量改进能力以及RTC对单元环境的影响。

结果

结果聚焦于2个被选来突出现有质量改进能力极端差异的单元。B单元的特点是现有环境良好。RTC是在一位积极进取的经理和协作文化的环境中实施的。在组织提供的结构支持下,该单元的质量改进能力通过RTC得到了加强。工作人员认识到利用RTC流程支持质量改进工作的潜力。E单元的工作人员对RTC的体验则不同。与B单元一样,他们也得到了所在组织提供的类似结构支持,但他们没有同样有利于实施RTC的现有文化或政治环境。他们缺乏内部动力,觉得只是因为必须做才开展RTC。尽管他们在RTC活动中取得了一些成功,但工作人员对RTC可为持续质量改进工作提供的方法没有同样的理解。

结论

RTC有潜力成为促使各单元开展质量改进的有力工具。当在支持性环境中实施RTC时,这种情况最易出现。一刀切并不适用,行政机构在实施大规模质量改进项目之前必须考虑每个环境的独特背景。使用像质量组织这样的既定框架,可以突出特定护理环境中所需的独特支持,以增加成功参与的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/4279911/0632d9a323a7/12913_2014_642_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验