Cranley Lisa A, Hoben Matthias, Yeung Jasper, Estabrooks Carole A, Norton Peter G, Wagg Adrian
Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 12;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2978-0.
Interventions to improve quality of care for residents of long-term care facilities, and to examine the sustainability and spread of such initiatives, remain a top research priority. The purpose of this exploratory study was to assess the extent to which activities initiated in a quality improvement (QI) collaborative study using care aide led teams were sustained or spread following cessation of the initial project and to identify factors that led to its success.
This study used an exploratory mixed methods study design and was conducted in seven residential long-term care facilities in two Canadian provinces. Sustainability and spread of QI activities were assessed by a questionnaire over five time points for 18 months following the collaborative study with staff from both intervention with non-intervention units. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with care managers at six and 12 months. QI team success in applying the QI model was ranked as high, medium, or low using criteria developed by the research team. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and General Estimating Equations were used to analyze the data. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
In total, 683 surveys were received over the five time periods from 476 unique individuals on a facility unit. Seven managers were interviewed. A total of 533 surveys were analyzed. While both intervention and non-intervention units experienced a decline over time in all outcome measures, this decline was significantly less pronounced on intervention units. Facilities with medium and high success ranking had significantly higher scores in all four outcomes than facilities with a low success ranking. Care aides reported significantly less involvement of others in QI activities, less empowerment and less satisfaction with the quality of their work life than regulated care providers. Manager interviews provided evidence of sustainability of QI activities on the intervention units in four of the seven facilities up to 18 months following the intervention and demonstrated the need for continued staff and leadership engagement.
Sustainability of a QI project which empowers and engages care aides is possible and achievable, but requires ongoing staff and leadership engagement.
改善长期护理机构居民护理质量的干预措施,以及考察此类举措的可持续性和推广情况,仍然是首要研究重点。这项探索性研究的目的是评估在一项使用护理助手主导团队的质量改进(QI)合作研究中启动的活动,在初始项目结束后维持或推广的程度,并确定促成其成功的因素。
本研究采用探索性混合方法研究设计,在加拿大两个省份的七家长期护理机构进行。在合作研究结束后的18个月内,通过对干预组和非干预组的工作人员进行五次问卷调查来评估QI活动的可持续性和推广情况。在6个月和12个月时对护理经理进行半结构化访谈。根据研究团队制定的标准,将QI团队应用QI模型的成功程度评为高、中或低。使用描述性统计、双变量分析和广义估计方程来分析数据。访谈数据采用主题分析法进行分析。
在五个时间段内,共收到来自476名不同个体在机构单元的683份调查问卷。采访了七位经理。共分析了533份调查问卷。虽然干预组和非干预组在所有结果指标上都随时间下降,但干预组的下降明显不那么明显。成功排名为中高的机构在所有四个结果方面的得分显著高于成功排名低的机构。与受监管的护理提供者相比,护理助手报告其他人在QI活动中的参与显著较少、赋权较少且对工作生活质量的满意度较低。经理访谈提供了证据,表明在七个机构中的四个机构,干预措施实施后的18个月内,干预单元的QI活动具有可持续性,并表明需要持续的工作人员和领导参与。
赋予护理助手权力并让其参与的QI项目具有可持续性且是可以实现的,但需要持续的工作人员和领导参与。