Tempest Stephanie, Jefferson Richard
Occupational Therapy, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Headway SELNWK, London, UK.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36(1):11-5. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141185.
Although deemed a globally accepted framework, there remains scare evidence on the process and outcome of implementing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) within neurorehabilitation.
This review briefly explores the existing, broader literature and then reports on two action research projects, undertaken in England, specifically within stroke and neurorehabilitation. Working with participants, including clinicians from in-patient and community settings, there are now 35 different ways identified for the use of the ICF.
The outcome of the first project highlights that using the ICF enhances communication within and beyond the acute stroke service, fosters holistic thinking and clarifies team roles. To adopt it into clinical practice, the ICF must be adapted to meet local service needs. The use of action research has facilitated the knowledge translation process which has enabled the ICF to become a clinical reality in neurorehabilitation, with clinicians identifying a range of potential uses.
尽管国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)被视为一个全球公认的框架,但在神经康复领域实施该分类的过程和结果方面,证据仍然匮乏。
本综述首先简要探讨现有的更广泛文献,然后报告在英国开展的两个行动研究项目,特别是在中风和神经康复领域。与包括住院和社区环境中的临床医生在内的参与者合作,现已确定了35种使用ICF的不同方式。
第一个项目的结果表明,使用ICF可加强急性中风服务内外的沟通,促进整体思维并明确团队角色。要将其应用于临床实践,必须对ICF进行调整以满足当地服务需求。行动研究的运用促进了知识转化过程,使ICF在神经康复中成为临床现实,临床医生确定了一系列潜在用途。