Swinnen Eva, Baeyens Jean-Pierre, Hens Gerrit, Knaepen Kristel, Beckwée David, Michielsen Marc, Clijsen Ron, Kerckhofs Eric
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Research (RERE), Brussels, Belgium Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Biometry and Biomechanics (BIOM), Brussels, Belgium University College Physiotherapy Thim van der Laan, Landquart, Switzerland.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36(1):81-91. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141195.
Efficacy studies concerning robot assisted gait rehabilitation showed limited clinical benefits. A changed kinematic pattern might be responsible for this. Little is known about the kinematics of the trunk and pelvis during robot assisted treadmill walking (RATW).
The aim of this study was to assess the trunk and pelvis kinematics of healthy subjects during RATW, with different amounts of body weight support (BWS) compared to regular treadmill walking (TW).
Eighteen healthy participants walked on a treadmill, while kinematics were registered by an electromagnetic tracking device. Hereafter, the kinematics of pelvis and trunk were registered during RATW (guidance force 30%) with 0%, 30% and 50% BWS.
Compared to TW, RATW showed a decrease in the following trunk movements: axial rotation, anteroposterior flexion, lateral and anteroposterior translation. Besides, a decrease in lateral tilting and all translation of the pelvis was found when comparing RATW with TW. Furthermore, the anteroposterior tilting of the pelvis increased during RATW.
In general, there was a decrease in trunk and pelvis movement amplitude during RATW compared with regular TW. Though, it is not known if these changes are responsible for the limited efficacy of robot assisted gait rehabilitation. Further research is indicated.
有关机器人辅助步态康复的疗效研究显示临床益处有限。运动学模式的改变可能是其原因。对于机器人辅助跑步机行走(RATW)过程中躯干和骨盆的运动学情况知之甚少。
本研究旨在评估健康受试者在RATW过程中躯干和骨盆的运动学情况,并将不同体重支持(BWS)量下的情况与常规跑步机行走(TW)进行比较。
18名健康参与者在跑步机上行走,同时通过电磁跟踪设备记录运动学数据。此后,在BWS分别为0%、30%和50%的情况下,记录RATW(引导力30%)过程中骨盆和躯干的运动学数据。
与TW相比,RATW过程中以下躯干运动减少:轴向旋转、前后屈伸、侧向和前后平移。此外,将RATW与TW比较时,发现骨盆的侧向倾斜和所有平移均减少。而且,RATW过程中骨盆的前后倾斜增加。
总体而言,与常规TW相比,RATW过程中躯干和骨盆的运动幅度减小。不过,尚不清楚这些变化是否是机器人辅助步态康复疗效有限的原因。需要进一步研究。