Pediatrics. 2015 Jan;135(1):196-202. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3163.
The American Academy of Pediatrics strongly supports the Polio Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. This plan was endorsed in November 2012 by the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization of the World Health Organization and published by the World Health Organization in April 2013. As a key component of the plan, it will be necessary to stop oral polio vaccine (OPV) use globally to achieve eradication, because the attenuated viruses in the vaccine rarely can cause polio. The plan includes procedures for elimination of vaccine-associated paralytic polio and circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs). cVDPVs can proliferate when vaccine viruses are transmitted among susceptible people, resulting in mutations conferring both the neurovirulence and transmissibility characteristics of wild polioviruses. Although there are 3 different types of wild poliovirus strains, the polio eradication effort has already resulted in the global elimination of type 2 poliovirus for more than a decade. Type 3 poliovirus may be eliminated because the wild type 3 poliovirus was last detected in 2012. Thus, of the 3 wild types, only wild type 1 poliovirus is still known to be circulating and causing disease. OPV remains the key vaccine for eradicating wild polioviruses in polio-infected countries because it induces high levels of systemic immunity to prevent paralysis and intestinal immunity to reduce transmission. However, OPV is a rare cause of paralysis and the substantial decrease in wild-type disease has resulted in estimates that the vaccine is causing more polio-related paralysis annually in recent years than the wild virus. The new endgame strategic plan calls for stepwise removal of the type 2 poliovirus component from trivalent oral vaccines, because type 2 wild poliovirus appears to have been eradicated (since 1999) and yet is the main cause of cVDPV outbreaks and approximately 40% of vaccine-associated paralytic polio cases. The Endgame and Strategic Plan will be accomplished by shifting from trivalent OPV to bivalent OPV (containing types 1 and 3 poliovirus only). It will be necessary to introduce trivalent inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) into routine immunization programs in all countries using OPV to provide population immunity to type 2 before the switch from trivalent OPV to bivalent OPV. The Global Polio Eradication Initiative hopes to achieve global eradication of polio by 2018 with this strategy, after which all OPV use will be stopped. Challenges expected for adding IPV into routine immunization schedules include higher cost of IPV compared with OPV, cold-chain capacity limits, more complex administration of vaccine because IPV requires injections as opposed to oral administration, and inferior intestinal immunity conferred by IPV. The goal of this report is to help pediatricians understand the change in strategy and outline ways that pediatricians can help global polio eradication efforts, including advocating for the resources needed to accomplish polio eradication and for incorporation of IPV into routine immunization programs in all countries.
美国儿科学会坚决支持全球消灭脊髓灰质炎倡议的《消灭脊髓灰质炎和终局战略计划》。该计划于 2012 年 11 月得到世界卫生组织免疫战略咨询专家组的认可,并于 2013 年 4 月由世界卫生组织发布。作为该计划的一个关键组成部分,全球范围内停用口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(OPV)以实现消灭脊髓灰质炎是必要的,因为疫苗中的减毒病毒很少会导致脊髓灰质炎。该计划包括消除疫苗相关麻痹性脊髓灰质炎和循环疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎病毒(cVDPV)的程序。当疫苗病毒在易感人群中传播时,cVDPV 会增殖,导致同时具有野生脊髓灰质炎病毒的神经毒性和传播特性的突变。尽管存在 3 种不同类型的野生脊髓灰质炎病毒株,但消灭脊髓灰质炎的努力已经导致全球消灭脊髓灰质炎病毒 2 型超过 10 年。脊髓灰质炎病毒 3 型可能被消灭,因为野生型 3 型脊髓灰质炎病毒最后一次检测到是在 2012 年。因此,在这 3 种野生类型中,只有野生型 1 型脊髓灰质炎病毒仍被认为在循环并引起疾病。OPV 仍然是消灭脊髓灰质炎病毒的关键疫苗,因为它能诱导高水平的全身免疫力以预防瘫痪和肠道免疫力以减少传播。然而,OPV 是导致瘫痪的罕见原因,野生型疾病的大量减少导致估计近年来疫苗每年导致的与脊髓灰质炎相关的瘫痪病例比野生病毒更多。新的终局战略计划要求逐步从三价口服疫苗中去除脊髓灰质炎病毒 2 型成分,因为脊髓灰质炎病毒 2 型似乎已经被消灭(自 1999 年以来),但它是 cVDPV 暴发的主要原因,约占疫苗相关麻痹性脊髓灰质炎病例的 40%。终局和战略计划将通过从三价 OPV 转变为二价 OPV(仅包含 1 型和 3 型脊髓灰质炎病毒)来实现。在从三价 OPV 转换为二价 OPV 之前,所有使用 OPV 的国家都需要将三价脊髓灰质炎灭活疫苗(IPV)引入常规免疫规划,为人群提供对 2 型脊髓灰质炎病毒的免疫力。全球消灭脊髓灰质炎倡议希望通过该战略在 2018 年实现全球消灭脊髓灰质炎,届时将停止使用所有 OPV。在常规免疫计划中加入 IPV 预计会面临挑战,包括 IPV 比 OPV 成本更高、冷链能力有限、由于 IPV 需要注射而不是口服给药,疫苗管理更复杂以及 IPV 赋予的肠道免疫力较差。本报告的目的是帮助儿科医生了解策略的变化,并概述儿科医生如何帮助全球消灭脊髓灰质炎的努力,包括倡导完成脊髓灰质炎消灭工作所需的资源,以及在所有国家将 IPV 纳入常规免疫规划。