• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于终末期肾病相关胸腔积液的留置胸腔导管:病例系列

Indwelling pleural catheters for pleural effusions associated with end-stage renal disease: a case series.

作者信息

Potechin Rajini, Amjadi Kayvan, Srour Nadim

出版信息

Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2015 Feb;9(1):22-7. doi: 10.1177/1753465814565353.

DOI:10.1177/1753465814565353
PMID:25548369
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pleural effusions are a common complication of end-stage renal disease.These effusions are occasionally refractory to medical management, but few options are then available. Indwelling pleural catheter insertion (IPC) has been well described for the management of malignant pleural effusions and, more recently, of nonmalignant effusions of other origin. We aimed to analyze our experience and to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using IPCs for pleural effusion associated with end-stage renal disease.

METHODS

We constructed a cohort of patients who underwent IPC insertion for pleural effusions associated with end-stage renal disease. The IPCs were inserted as a palliative measure in patients who had thoracentesis twice within the preceding 2 weeks, no evidence of infection and either failure to respond, complications or intolerance to maximal medical therapy, or if IPC insertion would enable discharge when the patient was hospitalized mainly for dyspnea due to pleural effusion.

RESULTS

There were nine IPCs inserted in eight patients. Patients had significant dyspnea at baseline with a median baseline dyspnea index of 1.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 0–3]. Dyspnea improved significantly 2 weeks after catheter insertion with a median transitional dyspnea index of 6 (IQR 4.5–7.0). There was no occurrence of empyema or other major complications.Serum albumin did not decrease after catheter insertion. IPCs were removed in four patients(50%) and successful spontaneous pleurodesis occurred in three patients (37.5%) after a median of 77 days (IQR 9–208).

CONCLUSION

IPC insertion for pleural effusions associated with end-stage renal disease appears safe and effective. Larger studies are needed, particularly regarding the impact of this intervention on quality of life.

摘要

背景

胸腔积液是终末期肾病的常见并发症。这些积液有时对药物治疗无效,但此时可供选择的方案很少。留置胸腔导管插入术(IPC)已被广泛用于治疗恶性胸腔积液,最近也用于治疗其他原因引起的非恶性积液。我们旨在分析我们的经验,并评估使用IPC治疗终末期肾病相关胸腔积液的安全性和可行性。

方法

我们构建了一组因终末期肾病相关胸腔积液而接受IPC插入术的患者队列。对于在过去2周内进行过两次胸腔穿刺、无感染证据且对最大药物治疗无反应、出现并发症或不耐受,或者因胸腔积液导致呼吸困难而住院且插入IPC可使其出院的患者,将IPC作为一种姑息性措施插入。

结果

8例患者共插入9根IPC。患者基线时存在明显呼吸困难,基线呼吸困难指数中位数为1.5[四分位间距(IQR)0 - 3]。导管插入后2周呼吸困难显著改善,过渡性呼吸困难指数中位数为6(IQR 4.5 - 7.0)。未发生脓胸或其他主要并发症。导管插入后血清白蛋白未降低。中位77天(IQR 9 - 208)后,4例患者(50%)拔除了IPC,3例患者(37.5%)成功实现了自发性胸膜固定术。

结论

插入IPC治疗终末期肾病相关胸腔积液似乎安全有效。需要进行更大规模的研究,特别是关于这种干预对生活质量的影响。

相似文献

1
Indwelling pleural catheters for pleural effusions associated with end-stage renal disease: a case series.用于终末期肾病相关胸腔积液的留置胸腔导管:病例系列
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2015 Feb;9(1):22-7. doi: 10.1177/1753465814565353.
2
Use of indwelling pleural catheters for cardiogenic pleural effusions.留置胸腔导管治疗心原性胸腔积液。
Chest. 2013 Nov;144(5):1603-1608. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-0331.
3
Clinical Predictors of Successful and Earlier Removal of Indwelling Pleural Catheters in Benign Pleural Effusions.良性胸腔积液中留置胸腔导管成功和更早拔除的临床预测因素。
Respiration. 2019;98(3):239-245. doi: 10.1159/000500428. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
4
Indwelling pleural catheters for non-malignant effusions: a multicentre review of practice.留置胸膜导管治疗非恶性胸腔积液:多中心实践回顾。
Thorax. 2014 Oct;69(10):959-61. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204563. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
5
PleurX catheter for the management of refractory pleural effusions in congestive heart failure.用于治疗充血性心力衰竭难治性胸腔积液的PleurX导管
Tex Heart Inst J. 2009;36(1):38-43.
6
Indwelling Pleural Catheters for Nonmalignant Effusions: Evidence-Based Answers to Clinical Concerns.用于非恶性胸腔积液的留置胸腔导管:对临床问题的循证解答
Am J Med Sci. 2017 Sep;354(3):230-235. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
Indwelling pleural catheters reduce inpatient days over pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion.留置胸腔导管可减少恶性胸腔积液行胸膜固定术的住院天数。
Chest. 2012 Aug;142(2):394-400. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2657.
8
Home-management of malignant pleural effusion with an indwelling pleural catheter: ten years experience.留置胸腔导管在家中治疗恶性胸腔积液:十年经验。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;38(12):1161-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.08.021. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
9
Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial.留置胸腔导管与胸腔引流管和滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液呼吸困难的效果:TIME2 随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.
10
Indwelling pleural catheters: an overview and real-life experience.留置胸膜导管:概述及真实临床经验。
QJM. 2019 Aug 1;112(8):599-604. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcz116.

引用本文的文献

1
Pleural Effusion: Shedding Light on Pleural Disease Beyond Infection and Malignancy.胸腔积液:揭示感染和恶性肿瘤之外的胸膜疾病
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 3;61(3):443. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030443.
2
Early discharge for patients with benign pleural effusions using a Wayne catheter (pigtail) chest drain - analysis of safety, complications, and quality of life.使用 Wayne 导管(猪尾)引流管对良性胸腔积液患者进行早期出院 - 安全性、并发症和生活质量分析。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022 Feb 28;49:e20213139. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20213139. eCollection 2022.
3
Indwelling pleural catheters for non-malignant pleural effusions: report on a single centre's 10 years of experience.
留置胸腔导管治疗非恶性胸腔积液:单中心 10 年经验报告。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Jan;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000501.
4
Hepatic hydrothorax: indwelling catheter-related infection.肝性胸水:留置导管相关感染
BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Mar 15;12(3):e227635. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227635.
5
Indwelling pleural catheters: complications and management strategies.留置胸膜导管:并发症及管理策略
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jul;10(7):4659-4666. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.160.