Suppr超能文献

在临床环境中使用医师总体评估来衡量和跟踪患者的结果。

Using the Physician Global Assessment in a clinical setting to measure and track patient outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston2Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Apr;151(4):375-81. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3513.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

In dermatology, the development of objective, standardized quality measures that can be used in a clinical setting is important to be able to respond to the needs of payers and credentialing and licensure bodies and to demonstrate dermatologic value.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the feasibility of using Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores to collect and track patient acne and psoriasis outcomes over time.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The PGA severity scores were included on physicians' billing sheets for patients with acne and psoriasis seen at a tertiary care center outpatient dermatology clinic from June 2011 through October 2012. A subset of patients from 5 clinics completed Patient Global Assessments (PtGAs) between November 2011 and May 2012. Thirty dermatology clinicians saw a total of 2770 patients with acne and 1516 patients with psoriasis in clinic, recording PGA scores for each patient. The PtGA scores were collected from 52 and 103 patients with acne and psoriasis, respectively, within the larger sample.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Longitudinal PGA severity scores were collected for acne and psoriasis. The PGA severity scores were analyzed over time, with the hypothesis that patient scores for both acne and psoriasis would improve between the initial and follow-up visits. The PtGA scores from a subset of clinics and dates were compared with PGA scores to assess within-clinic reliability, with the hypothesis that there would be good agreement between clinician and patient assessments.

RESULTS

New patient PGA outcomes showed considerable improvement over time. At 3-month follow-up, 14.6% of the acne cohort was graded as effectively clear, compared with 2.1% at baseline (P < .001). Similarly, at 3-month follow-up, 22.3% of the psoriasis cohort was graded as effectively clear, compared with 3.1% at baseline (P < .001). Additionally, interobserver agreement between PGA and PtGA scores was good (acne, κ = 0.68; psoriasis, κ = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The PGA can be readily incorporated into practice to track patient acne and psoriasis outcomes over time, representing an opportunity for dermatologists to evaluate performance and validate practice guidelines.

摘要

重要性

在皮肤病学中,开发能够在临床环境中使用的客观、标准化的质量指标对于满足支付方和认证及许可机构的需求以及展示皮肤病学价值非常重要。

目的

研究使用医师总体评估 (PGA) 评分来长期收集和跟踪患者痤疮和银屑病结局的可行性。

设计、地点和参与者:2011 年 6 月至 2012 年 10 月,在一家三级保健中心的皮肤科门诊,PGA 严重程度评分被纳入皮肤科医生为痤疮和银屑病患者开具的计费表中。2011 年 11 月至 2012 年 5 月期间,5 家诊所的部分患者完成了患者总体评估 (PtGA)。共有 30 名皮肤科医生在诊所共诊治了 2770 例痤疮患者和 1516 例银屑病患者,为每位患者记录 PGA 评分。在较大的样本中,分别从 52 例和 103 例痤疮和银屑病患者中收集了 PtGA 评分。

主要结果和措施

为痤疮和银屑病收集了纵向 PGA 严重程度评分。随着时间的推移分析 PGA 严重程度评分,假设痤疮和银屑病患者的评分在初次就诊和随访之间会有所改善。将来自部分诊所和日期的 PtGA 评分与 PGA 评分进行比较,以评估诊所内的可靠性,假设临床医生和患者的评估之间存在良好的一致性。

结果

新患者 PGA 结局显示出随着时间的推移有了显著的改善。在 3 个月的随访中,痤疮组的 14.6%被评为有效清除,而基线时为 2.1%(P < 0.001)。同样,在 3 个月的随访中,银屑病组的 22.3%被评为有效清除,而基线时为 3.1%(P < 0.001)。此外,PGA 和 PtGA 评分之间的观察者间一致性良好(痤疮,κ=0.68;银屑病,κ=0.70)。

结论和相关性

PGA 可轻松纳入实践,以长期跟踪患者的痤疮和银屑病结局,为皮肤科医生评估绩效和验证实践指南提供了机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验