Suppr超能文献

使用单步方法改进对已分型和未分型个体的窝产仔数和仔猪死亡率的遗传评估。

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.

作者信息

Guo X, Christensen O F, Ostersen T, Wang Y, Lund M S, Su G

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2015 Feb;93(2):503-12. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8331.

Abstract

A single-step method allows genetic evaluation using information of phenotypes, pedigree, and markers from genotyped and nongenotyped individuals simultaneously. This paper compared genomic predictions obtained from a single-step BLUP (SSBLUP) method, a genomic BLUP (GBLUP) method, a selection index blending (SELIND) method, and a traditional pedigree-based method (BLUP) for total number of piglets born (TNB), litter size at d 5 after birth (LS5), and mortality rate before d 5 (Mort; including stillbirth) in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs. Data sets of 778,095 litters from 309,362 Landrace sows and 472,001 litters from 190,760 Yorkshire sows were used for the analysis. There were 332,795 Landrace and 207,255 Yorkshire animals in the pedigree data, among which 3,445 Landrace pigs (1,366 boars and 2,079 sows) and 3,372 Yorkshire pigs (1,241 boars and 2,131 sows) were genotyped with the Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip. The results showed that the 3 methods with marker information (SSBLUP, GBLUP, and SELIND) produced more accurate predictions for genotyped animals than the pedigree-based method. For genotyped animals, the average of reliabilities for all traits in both breeds using traditional BLUP was 0.091, which increased to 0.171 w+hen using GBLUP and to 0.179 when using SELIND and further increased to 0.209 when using SSBLUP. Furthermore, the average reliability of EBV for nongenotyped animals was increased from 0.091 for traditional BLUP to 0.105 for the SSBLUP. The results indicate that the SSBLUP is a good approach to practical genomic prediction of litter size and piglet mortality in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire populations.

摘要

单步方法允许同时使用来自基因型个体和非基因型个体的表型、系谱和标记信息进行遗传评估。本文比较了单步BLUP(SSBLUP)方法、基因组BLUP(GBLUP)方法、选择指数混合(SELIND)方法和传统的基于系谱的方法(BLUP)对丹麦长白猪和约克夏猪的总产仔数(TNB)、出生后第5天的窝仔数(LS5)以及出生后第5天前的死亡率(Mort;包括死胎)的基因组预测。分析使用了来自309362头长白母猪的778095窝数据和来自190760头约克夏母猪的472001窝数据。系谱数据中有332795头长白猪和207255头约克夏猪,其中3445头长白猪(1366头公猪和2079头母猪)和3372头约克夏猪(1241头公猪和2131头母猪)使用Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip进行了基因分型。结果表明,与基于系谱的方法相比,三种具有标记信息的方法(SSBLUP、GBLUP和SELIND)对基因型动物的预测更准确。对于基因型动物,两个品种所有性状使用传统BLUP时的可靠性平均值为0.091,使用GBLUP时增加到0.171,使用SELIND时增加到0.179,使用SSBLUP时进一步增加到0.209。此外,非基因型动物的EBV平均可靠性从传统BLUP的0.091提高到SSBLUP的0.105。结果表明,SSBLUP是丹麦长白猪和约克夏猪群体窝仔数和仔猪死亡率实际基因组预测的一种好方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验