• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

KPRR:一种有效捕捉基因组预测中非加性效应的新型机器学习方法。

KPRR: a novel machine learning approach for effectively capturing nonadditive effects in genomic prediction.

作者信息

Li Mianyan, Hall Thomas, MacHugh David E, Chen Liang, Garrick Dorian, Wang Lixian, Zhao Fuping

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.

Animal Genomics Laboratory, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.

出版信息

Brief Bioinform. 2024 Nov 22;26(1). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae683.

DOI:10.1093/bib/bbae683
PMID:39749663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11695904/
Abstract

Nonadditive genetic effects pose significant challenges to traditional genomic selection methods for quantitative traits. Machine learning approaches, particularly kernel-based methods, offer promising solutions to overcome these limitations. In this study, we developed a novel machine learning method, KPRR, which integrated a polynomial kernel into ridge regression to effectively capture nonadditive genetic effects. The predictive performance and computational efficiency of KPRR were evaluated using six datasets from various species, encompassing a total of 18 traits. All the traits were known to be influenced by additive, dominance, or epistatic genetic effects. We compared the performance of KPRR against six other genomic prediction methods: SPVR, BayesB, GBLUP, GEBLUP, GDBLUP, and DeepGS. For datasets dominated by additive effects, KPRR achieved superior prediction accuracies in the wheat dataset and comparable performance in the cattle dataset when compared to GBLUP. For datasets influenced by dominance effects, KPRR matched GDBLUP in accuracies in the pig dataset and outperformed GDBLUP in the sheep dataset. For datasets exhibiting epistatic effects, KPRR outperformed other methods in some traits, while BayesB showed superior performance in others. Incorporating nonadditive effects into a GBLUP model led to overall improvements in prediction accuracy. Regarding computational efficiency, KPRR was consistently the fastest, while BayesB was the slowest. Our findings demonstrated that KPRR provided significant advantages over traditional genomic prediction methods in capturing nonadditive effects.

摘要

非加性遗传效应对传统的数量性状基因组选择方法提出了重大挑战。机器学习方法,特别是基于核的方法,为克服这些局限性提供了有前景的解决方案。在本研究中,我们开发了一种新颖的机器学习方法KPRR,它将多项式核集成到岭回归中,以有效捕获非加性遗传效应。使用来自不同物种的六个数据集对KPRR的预测性能和计算效率进行了评估,这些数据集总共包含18个性状。已知所有性状都受加性、显性或上位性遗传效应的影响。我们将KPRR的性能与其他六种基因组预测方法进行了比较:SPVR、BayesB、GBLUP、GEBLUP、GDBLUP和DeepGS。对于以加性效应为主的数据集,与GBLUP相比,KPRR在小麦数据集中实现了更高的预测准确性,在牛数据集中的性能与之相当。对于受显性效应影响的数据集,KPRR在猪数据集中的准确性与GDBLUP相当,在绵羊数据集中的表现优于GDBLUP。对于表现出上位性效应的数据集,KPRR在某些性状上优于其他方法,而BayesB在其他性状上表现更优。将非加性效应纳入GBLUP模型可总体提高预测准确性。在计算效率方面,KPRR始终是最快的,而BayesB是最慢的。我们的研究结果表明,在捕获非加性效应方面,KPRR比传统的基因组预测方法具有显著优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a9/11695904/3e1bac0013e3/bbae683f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a9/11695904/279d3cb1d184/bbae683f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a9/11695904/eddd97dd8ecb/bbae683f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a9/11695904/cd9094b20997/bbae683f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a9/11695904/3e1bac0013e3/bbae683f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a9/11695904/279d3cb1d184/bbae683f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a9/11695904/eddd97dd8ecb/bbae683f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a9/11695904/cd9094b20997/bbae683f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a9/11695904/3e1bac0013e3/bbae683f4.jpg

相似文献

1
KPRR: a novel machine learning approach for effectively capturing nonadditive effects in genomic prediction.KPRR:一种有效捕捉基因组预测中非加性效应的新型机器学习方法。
Brief Bioinform. 2024 Nov 22;26(1). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae683.
2
Genomic prediction accounting for dominance and epistatic genetic effects on litter size traits in Large White pigs.考虑显性和上位性遗传效应的大白猪产仔数性状基因组预测
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf004.
3
Genome-wide prediction for complex traits under the presence of dominance effects in simulated populations using GBLUP and machine learning methods.使用 GBLUP 和机器学习方法在模拟群体中存在显性效应的情况下对复杂性状进行全基因组预测。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Jun 1;98(6). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa179.
4
Genomic dissection of repeatability considering additive and nonadditive genetic effects for semen production traits in beef and dairy bulls.考虑加性和非加性遗传效应的基因组剖析对肉牛和奶牛公牛精液生产性状的重复性。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Sep 1;100(9). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac241.
5
Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.基于基因组的苹果加性和非加性遗传方差估计及跨环境表型预测
G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Oct 23;5(12):2711-8. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.021105.
6
Genomic Predictions With Nonadditive Effects Improved Estimates of Additive Effects and Predictions of Total Genetic Values in .具有非加性效应的基因组预测改进了加性效应估计和总遗传值预测。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 7;12:666820. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.666820. eCollection 2021.
7
A Stacking Ensemble Learning Framework for Genomic Prediction.一种用于基因组预测的堆叠集成学习框架。
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 4;12:600040. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.600040. eCollection 2021.
8
ExAutoGP: Enhancing Genomic Prediction Stability and Interpretability with Automated Machine Learning and SHAP.ExAutoGP:通过自动机器学习和SHAP增强基因组预测的稳定性和可解释性
Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 18;15(8):1172. doi: 10.3390/ani15081172.
9
Using machine learning to realize genetic site screening and genomic prediction of productive traits in pigs.利用机器学习实现猪生产性状的遗传位点筛选和基因组预测。
FASEB J. 2023 Jun;37(6):e22961. doi: 10.1096/fj.202300245R.
10
Genomic prediction of blood biomarkers of metabolic disorders in Holstein cattle using parametric and nonparametric models.利用参数和非参数模型对荷斯坦奶牛代谢紊乱血液生物标志物进行基因组预测。
Genet Sel Evol. 2024 Apr 29;56(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00903-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Semi-parametric validation of genomic predictions and polygenic risk scores with the Blupf90 software suite.使用Blupf90软件套件对基因组预测和多基因风险评分进行半参数验证。
G3 (Bethesda). 2025 Aug 6;15(8). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkaf136.
2
ExAutoGP: Enhancing Genomic Prediction Stability and Interpretability with Automated Machine Learning and SHAP.ExAutoGP:通过自动机器学习和SHAP增强基因组预测的稳定性和可解释性
Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 18;15(8):1172. doi: 10.3390/ani15081172.

本文引用的文献

1
Pleiotropy, epistasis and the genetic architecture of quantitative traits.数量性状的多效性、上位性和遗传结构。
Nat Rev Genet. 2024 Sep;25(9):639-657. doi: 10.1038/s41576-024-00711-3. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
2
Genomic selection in plant breeding: Key factors shaping two decades of progress.植物育种中的基因组选择:塑造二十年进展的关键因素。
Mol Plant. 2024 Apr 1;17(4):552-578. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
Impact of inclusion non-additive effects on genome-wide association and variance's components in Scottish black sheep.
苏格兰黑脸羊全基因组关联和方差分量中包含非加性效应的影响。
Anim Biotechnol. 2023 Dec;34(8):3765-3773. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2023.2224845. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
4
Performance of Bayesian and BLUP alphabets for genomic prediction: analysis, comparison and results.贝叶斯和 BLUP 字母在基因组预测中的性能:分析、比较和结果。
Heredity (Edinb). 2022 Jun;128(6):519-530. doi: 10.1038/s41437-022-00539-9. Epub 2022 May 4.
5
KCRR: a nonlinear machine learning with a modified genomic similarity matrix improved the genomic prediction efficiency.KCRR:一种利用改进的基因组相似性矩阵的非线性机器学习方法,提高了基因组预测效率。
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Nov 5;22(6). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbab132.
6
Applications of Support Vector Machine in Genomic Prediction in Pig and Maize Populations.支持向量机在猪和玉米群体基因组预测中的应用
Front Genet. 2020 Dec 3;11:598318. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.598318. eCollection 2020.
7
Multi-omics-data-assisted genomic feature markers preselection improves the accuracy of genomic prediction.多组学数据辅助的基因组特征标记预选择提高了基因组预测的准确性。
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2020 Dec 1;11(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40104-020-00515-5.
8
KAML: improving genomic prediction accuracy of complex traits using machine learning determined parameters.KAML:使用机器学习确定的参数来提高复杂性状的基因组预测准确性。
Genome Biol. 2020 Jun 17;21(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02052-w.
9
A deep convolutional neural network approach for predicting phenotypes from genotypes.一种基于深度卷积神经网络的基因型到表型预测方法。
Planta. 2018 Nov;248(5):1307-1318. doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-2976-9. Epub 2018 Aug 12.
10
Locally epistatic models for genome-wide prediction and association by importance sampling.用于全基因组预测和通过重要性抽样进行关联分析的局部上位性模型。
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Oct 17;49(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0348-8.