Lin Jingjun, Zhao Deming, Wang Jin, Wang Yang, Li Hua, Yin Xiaomin, Yang Lifeng, Zhou Xiangmei
The State Key Lab of Agrobiotechnology, Key Lab of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonosis, Ministry of Agriculture, National TSE Lab, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing 100193, China.
Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Université Paris-Sud 11, 91405 Orsay, France.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2015 Feb 15;163(3-4):146-56. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
As innate immune cells, macrophages are expected to respond to mycobacterial infection equally in both Mycobacterium bovis-infected cows and healthy cows. We previously found that monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) from M. bovis-infected cows respond differently than MDMs from healthy cows when exposed to in vitro M. bovis challenge. We have now used the Agilent™ Bovine Gene Expression Microarray to examine transcriptional differences between these MDMs. At a high multiplicity of infection (10), in vitro challenge led to changes in several thousands of genes, with dysregulation at multiple orders of magnitude. For example, significant changes were seen for colony stimulating factor 3 (granulocyte) (CSF3), colony stimulating factor 2 (granulocyte-macrophage) (CSF2), and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 (CCL20). Classical macrophage activation was also observed, although to a lesser degree in interleukin 12 (IL12) expression. For macrophages, kallikrein-related peptidase 12 (KLK12) and protease, serine, 2 (trypsin 2) (PRSS2), as well as a secreted protein, acidic, cysteine-rich (osteonectin) (SPARC)-centered matricellular gene network, were differentially expressed in infected animals. Finally, global transcriptome fold-changes caused by in vitro challenge were higher in healthy cows than in tuberculosis-positive cows, suggesting that healthy macrophages responded marginally better to in vitro infection. Macrophages from healthy and already infected animals can both be fully activated during M. bovis infection, yet there are differences between these macrophages: distinct expression pattern in matricellular proteins, and their different responses to in vitro infection.
作为天然免疫细胞,巨噬细胞有望在牛分枝杆菌感染的奶牛和健康奶牛中对分枝杆菌感染做出相同反应。我们之前发现,来自牛分枝杆菌感染奶牛的单核细胞衍生巨噬细胞(MDM)在体外受到牛分枝杆菌攻击时,其反应与来自健康奶牛的MDM不同。我们现在使用安捷伦™牛基因表达微阵列来检测这些MDM之间的转录差异。在高感染复数(10)下,体外攻击导致数千个基因发生变化,失调幅度达多个数量级。例如,集落刺激因子3(粒细胞)(CSF3)、集落刺激因子2(粒细胞-巨噬细胞)(CSF2)和趋化因子(C-C基序)配体20(CCL20)出现了显著变化。还观察到经典的巨噬细胞激活,尽管白细胞介素12(IL12)表达的激活程度较低。对于巨噬细胞,激肽释放酶相关肽酶12(KLK12)和丝氨酸蛋白酶2(胰蛋白酶2)(PRSS2),以及以分泌性酸性富含半胱氨酸蛋白(骨连接蛋白)(SPARC)为中心的基质细胞基因网络,在受感染动物中差异表达。最后,体外攻击引起的整体转录组倍数变化在健康奶牛中高于结核病阳性奶牛,这表明健康巨噬细胞对体外感染的反应略好。来自健康和已感染动物的巨噬细胞在牛分枝杆菌感染期间均可被完全激活,但这些巨噬细胞之间存在差异:基质细胞蛋白的表达模式不同,以及它们对体外感染的反应不同。