• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰医院肠外给药的方案依从性:实施情况的评估与成本估算

Protocol compliance of administering parenteral medication in Dutch hospitals: an evaluation and cost estimation of the implementation.

作者信息

Schilp Janneke, Boot Sanne, de Blok Carolien, Spreeuwenberg Peter, Wagner Cordula

机构信息

NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands Department of Public and Occupation Health, EMGO+Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 30;4(12):e005232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005232.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005232
PMID:25550289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4281535/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) are closely related to administration processes of parenteral medication. The Dutch Patient Safety Program provided a protocol for administering parenteral medication to reduce the amount of ADEs. The execution of the protocol was evaluated and a cost estimation was performed to provide insight in the associated costs of protocol compliance.

METHODS

A longitudinal evaluation study was performed in secondary care. A total of 2154 observations of the administration process of parenteral medication were carried out within 10 measurements in 19 hospitals between November 2011 and December 2012. The total time needed for the process was measured in a sample of five hospitals. Multilevel linear and logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the trend over time of the implementation and to assess the association between hospital and administration characteristics, and compliance of the protocol. A cost estimation provided insight into the costs of performing a complete administration process and the costs at department level for 1 year.

RESULTS

The complete protocol was performed in 19% of the observations. The proceeding 'check by a second nurse' was least performed. Large differences were found between individual hospitals in performing the administration protocol. The compliance of the protocol was negatively influenced in case of disturbance of the administrator. The overall trend over time of completion of the protocol fluctuated during the study period. On average, 3 min 26 s were needed to perform the complete protocol, which costs €2.42. Extrapolating the costs to department level, including cost for clinical lessons, the difference in costs in performing the complete protocol and an incomplete protocol was €7.891 for 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The protocol for administering parenteral medication is still not implemented completely, therefore an investment in time and Euros is needed.

摘要

目的

可预防的药物不良事件(ADEs)与肠外用药的给药过程密切相关。荷兰患者安全计划提供了一份肠外用药给药方案,以减少ADEs的发生量。对该方案的执行情况进行了评估,并进行了成本估算,以深入了解方案合规的相关成本。

方法

在二级护理机构中进行了一项纵向评估研究。2011年11月至2012年12月期间,在19家医院进行了10次测量,共对2154次肠外用药给药过程进行了观察。在五家医院的样本中测量了该过程所需的总时间。采用多水平线性和逻辑回归分析来分析实施的时间趋势,并评估医院与给药特征之间的关联以及方案的合规性。成本估算提供了对完成一个完整给药过程的成本以及部门层面一年成本的深入了解。

结果

在19%的观察中执行了完整方案。“由第二名护士检查”这一步骤执行得最少。各医院在执行给药方案方面存在很大差异。在给药人员受到干扰的情况下,方案的合规性受到负面影响。在研究期间,方案完成情况随时间的总体趋势波动。平均而言,执行完整方案需要3分26秒,成本为2.42欧元。将成本推算至部门层面,包括临床培训成本,执行完整方案和不完整方案的成本差异在一年中为7891欧元。

结论

肠外用药给药方案仍未完全实施,因此需要在时间和资金上进行投入。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89bb/4281535/b90dcf5acafb/bmjopen2014005232f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89bb/4281535/b90dcf5acafb/bmjopen2014005232f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89bb/4281535/b90dcf5acafb/bmjopen2014005232f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Protocol compliance of administering parenteral medication in Dutch hospitals: an evaluation and cost estimation of the implementation.荷兰医院肠外给药的方案依从性:实施情况的评估与成本估算
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 30;4(12):e005232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005232.
2
Nurse compliance with a protocol for safe injectable medication administration: comparison of two multicentre observational studies.护士对安全注射用药方案的依从性:两项多中心观察性研究的比较
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 5;8(1):e019648. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019648.
3
Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medication ordering system (CPOE/CDSS) in hospitalized patients.电子医嘱录入系统(CPOE/CDSS)在住院患者中的成本效益分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Aug;83(8):572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 23.
4
A Cost Minimization Analysis of Ready-to-Administer Prefilled Sterilized Syringes in a Dutch Hospital.一种用于荷兰医院的即用型预充式无菌注射器的成本最小化分析。
Clin Ther. 2019 Jun;41(6):1139-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 May 10.
5
Will meaningful use electronic medical records reduce hospital costs?有效使用电子病历会降低医院成本吗?
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Nov;19(10 Spec No):eSP19-25.
6
Implementation of Medication Safety Practice in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treatment.儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病治疗中药物安全实践的实施
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 May 26;19(5):1251-1257. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.5.1251.
7
Improving the implementation of perioperative safety guidelines using a multifaceted intervention approach: protocol of the IMPROVE study, a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.采用多方面干预方法改善围手术期安全指南的实施:IMPROVE研究方案,一项阶梯楔形整群随机试验
Implement Sci. 2015 Jan 8;10:3. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0198-5.
8
Preventable hospital admissions related to medication (HARM): cost analysis of the HARM study.可预防的与药物相关的医院入院(HARM):HARM 研究的成本分析。
Value Health. 2011 Jan;14(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.024.
9
The costs of adverse drug events in community hospitals.社区医院中药物不良事件的成本。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Mar;38(3):120-6. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38016-1.
10
Frequency and Severity of Parenteral Nutrition Medication Errors at a Large Children's Hospital After Implementation of Electronic Ordering and Compounding.一家大型儿童医院实施电子医嘱与配制后肠外营养用药错误的发生率及严重程度
Nutr Clin Pract. 2016 Apr;31(2):195-206. doi: 10.1177/0884533615591606. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of human factors and infusion pumps: lessons for procurement.人类因素与输液泵综述:采购经验教训
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 4;7:1425409. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1425409. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating deviations and considerations in daily practice when double-checking high-risk medication administration: A qualitative study using the FRAM.在对高风险药物给药进行二次核对时评估日常实践中的偏差和注意事项:一项使用功能共振分析方法的定性研究
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 1;10(4):e25637. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25637. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
3
Implementation of barcode medication administration (BMCA) technology on infusion pumps in the operating rooms.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of a clinical pharmacist-led training programme on intravenous medication errors: a controlled before and after study.临床药师主导的培训项目对静脉用药差错的影响:一项前后对照研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):319-24. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002357. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
2
Improving patient safety using the sterile cockpit principle during medication administration: a collaborative, unit-based project.运用无菌 cockpit原则提高给药过程中的患者安全:一项协作的、基于单元的项目。
J Nurs Manag. 2013 Jan;21(1):106-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01410.x. Epub 2012 May 28.
3
Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: a longitudinal retrospective patient record review study.
在手术室输液泵上实施条形码给药管理(BMCA)技术。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002023.
4
Can using the functional resonance analysis method, as an intervention, improve patient safety in hospitals?: a stepped wedge design protocol.可否使用功能共振分析方法作为干预措施来提高医院患者安全性?一项阶梯式楔形设计方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 13;21(1):1228. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07244-z.
5
Nature of adverse events with opioids in hospitalised patients: a post-hoc analysis of three patient record review studies.住院患者使用阿片类药物不良事件的性质:三项患者记录回顾性研究的事后分析
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 30;10(9):e038037. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038037.
6
Development of a safe drug administration assessment instrument for nursing students.为护理专业学生开发一种安全给药评估工具。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020 Feb 3;28:e3246. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2989.3246. eCollection 2020.
7
Effectiveness of double checking to reduce medication administration errors: a systematic review.双重核对以减少给药错误的效果:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jul;29(7):595-603. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009552. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of microbial contamination of parenteral medication prepared in a clinical versus pharmacy environment.临床环境与药剂环境制备的肠外药物的微生物污染:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 May;75(5):609-617. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02631-2. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
9
Nurse compliance with a protocol for safe injectable medication administration: comparison of two multicentre observational studies.护士对安全注射用药方案的依从性:两项多中心观察性研究的比较
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 5;8(1):e019648. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019648.
10
Experiences with Lean Six Sigma as improvement strategy to reduce parenteral medication administration errors and associated potential risk of harm.将精益六西格玛作为改进策略以减少肠外用药错误及相关潜在伤害风险的经验。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017 Jun 15;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u215011.w5936. eCollection 2017.
随着时间的推移,医院不良事件发生率的变化:一项纵向回顾性患者病历回顾研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Apr;22(4):290-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001126. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
4
Paradoxical effects of a hospital-based, multi-intervention programme aimed at reducing medication round interruptions.基于医院的多干预措施方案旨在减少医嘱执行干扰,但却产生了矛盾的效果。
J Nurs Manag. 2012 Apr;20(3):335-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01329.x. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
5
The effect of a multifaceted educational intervention on medication preparation and administration errors in neonatal intensive care.多方面教育干预对新生儿重症监护中药物准备和给药错误的影响。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Nov;97(6):F449-55. doi: 10.1136/fetalneonatal-2011-300989. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
6
A nationwide medication incidents reporting system in The Netherlands.荷兰全国药物不良事件报告系统。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):799-804. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000191. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
7
Preventable hospital admissions related to medication (HARM): cost analysis of the HARM study.可预防的与药物相关的医院入院(HARM):HARM 研究的成本分析。
Value Health. 2011 Jan;14(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.024.
8
Nature, occurrence and consequences of medication-related adverse events during hospitalization: a retrospective chart review in the Netherlands.住院期间与药物相关的不良事件的性质、发生情况和后果:荷兰的一项回顾性图表审查。
Drug Saf. 2010 Oct 1;33(10):853-64. doi: 10.2165/11536800-000000000-00000.
9
The impact of a set of interventions to reduce interruptions and distractions to nurses during medication administration.一组旨在减少护士给药过程中干扰和分心情况的干预措施的影响。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e52. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.036871. Epub 2010 May 28.
10
Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study.荷兰医院中的不良事件及潜在可预防死亡:一项回顾性患者病历审查研究的结果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Aug;18(4):297-302. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025924.