Coleman C Norman, Sullivan Julie M, Bader Judith L, Murrain-Hill Paula, Koerner John F, Garrett Andrew L, Weinstock David M, Case Cullen, Hrdina Chad, Adams Steven A, Whitcomb Robert C, Graeden Ellie, Shankman Robert, Lant Timothy, Maidment Bert W, Hatchett Richard C
*Office of Emergency Management, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC; †Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; ‡Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; §Radiation Injury Treatment Network, National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, MN; **Office of Policy and Planning, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC; ††Division of Strategic National Stockpile, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; ‡‡Radiation Studies Branch, Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; §§Gryphon Scientific, LLC, Rockville, MD; ***Biomedical Advanced Research & Development Authority, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC; †††Radiation/Nuclear Countermeasures Program, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Health Phys. 2015 Feb;108(2):149-60. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000249.
Resilience and the ability to mitigate the consequences of a nuclear incident are enhanced by (1) effective planning, preparation and training; (2) ongoing interaction, formal exercises, and evaluation among the sectors involved; (3) effective and timely response and communication; and (4) continuous improvements based on new science, technology, experience, and ideas. Public health and medical planning require a complex, multi-faceted systematic approach involving federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments; private sector organizations; academia; industry; international partners; and individual experts and volunteers. The approach developed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Nuclear Incident Medical Enterprise (NIME) is the result of efforts from government and nongovernment experts. It is a "bottom-up" systematic approach built on the available and emerging science that considers physical infrastructure damage, the spectrum of injuries, a scarce resources setting, the need for decision making in the face of a rapidly evolving situation with limited information early on, timely communication, and the need for tools and just-in-time information for responders who will likely be unfamiliar with radiation medicine and uncertain and overwhelmed in the face of the large number of casualties and the presence of radioactivity. The components of NIME can be used to support planning for, response to, and recovery from the effects of a nuclear incident. Recognizing that it is a continuous work-in-progress, the current status of the public health and medical preparedness and response for a nuclear incident is provided.
(1)有效的规划、准备和培训;(2)相关部门之间持续的互动、正式演习和评估;(3)有效且及时的应对与沟通;(4)基于新科学、技术、经验和理念的持续改进。公共卫生和医疗规划需要一种复杂、多层面的系统方法,涉及联邦、州、地方、部落和领地各级政府;私营部门组织;学术界;产业界;国际伙伴;以及个体专家和志愿者。美国卫生与公众服务部核事故医疗企业(NIME)制定的方法是政府和非政府专家共同努力的成果。它是一种“自下而上”的系统方法,建立在现有和新出现的科学基础之上,考虑了物理基础设施损坏、伤害范围、资源稀缺情况、在早期信息有限且情况迅速演变时进行决策的必要性、及时沟通,以及为可能不熟悉放射医学且面对大量伤亡和放射性物质时感到不确定和不知所措的应急人员提供工具和即时信息的必要性。NIME的组成部分可用于支持核事故影响的规划、应对和恢复工作。认识到这是一项持续进行的工作,本文介绍了核事故公共卫生和医疗准备与应对的当前状况。