Shcherba S N, Polovinkin V V
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 2014;173(4):83-6.
The article presents the follow-up study of 254 onco-proctologic patients after reconstructive abdominoperitoneal resections. Patients were divided into 4 statistically homogeneous groups (2 main and 2 control groups). A comparative analysis of middle and lateral laparotomy wounds healing was made. Laparotomy wounds were stitched up using conventional method (in layers, tightly) and using other method of prolonged flow-aspiration drainage of hypodermic tissue. Postoperative wound infections were noted in 11.4% patients in case of conventional means. The prolonged flow-aspiration drainage in laparotomy wounds causes only 1.5% of complications.
本文介绍了对254例接受重建性腹盆腔切除术的肿瘤直肠病患者的随访研究。患者被分为4个统计学上同质的组（2个主要组和2个对照组）。对正中剖腹术和侧剖腹术伤口愈合情况进行了比较分析。剖腹术伤口采用传统方法（分层紧密缝合）和皮下组织持续负压吸引引流的其他方法进行缝合。采用传统方法时，11.4%的患者出现术后伤口感染。剖腹术伤口持续负压吸引引流仅导致1.5%的并发症。
