Londoño Ana Maria Moreno, Schulz Peter J
Institute of Communication and Health, University of Lugano , Switzerland.
J Public Health Res. 2014 Dec 2;3(3):307. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2014.307.
The majority of current health literacy tools assess functional skills including reading, writing, and numeracy. Although these tools have been able to underline the impact of such skills on individuals' health behaviour, there is a need for comprehensive measures to examine more advanced skills. The individual's ability to use health-related information considering his/her own health context, and judging positive and negative consequences of their decisions has been conceptualized as judgment skills. The present study used a newly developed judgment skills tool to explore asthma self-management practices.
Eighty asthma patients were recruited from medical offices during the year 2013. The questionnaire was self-administered and contained health literacy questions, the judgment skill tool, the Asthma Control Test, and several self-management questions.
Sixty-nine percent of participants had adequate health literacy, while 24% and 5% had marginal and inadequate levels, respectively. The high-judgment group referred more to their doctor when experiencing asthma problems t(76)=-2.18, P<0.032; complied more with the use of their control medicine t(77)=-3.24, P<0.002 and went more regularly to the doctor t(78)=-1.80, P<0.038 (one-tailed) than the low-judgment group.
The judgment skills tool can help identify asthma patients' health information use and reveal how this use may affect some self-management practices. Significance for public healthPatients' health literacy has a great impact on their health behaviours and their health outcomes. Therefore, it has become more and more common to measure health literacy within the healthcare setting to determine the most effective approach to target patients. The measurement of asthma judgment skills contribute to a deeper understanding of patients' asthma self-management in crucial topics for asthma control, and have the advantage of assessing the specific abilities needed for this particular condition, which in turn benefits the translation of the findings from the use of this tool into strategies that directly tackle the needs of asthma patients.
当前大多数健康素养工具评估的是包括阅读、写作和算术在内的功能性技能。尽管这些工具能够凸显此类技能对个人健康行为的影响,但仍需要全面的措施来检验更高级的技能。个体结合自身健康状况运用与健康相关信息,并判断其决策的正负后果的能力已被概念化为判断技能。本研究使用一种新开发的判断技能工具来探究哮喘自我管理实践。
2013年从医疗机构招募了80名哮喘患者。问卷采用自填式,包含健康素养问题、判断技能工具、哮喘控制测试以及若干自我管理问题。
69%的参与者具备足够的健康素养,而分别有24%和5%的参与者处于边缘水平和不足水平。与低判断技能组相比,高判断技能组在出现哮喘问题时更频繁地咨询医生(t(76)= -2.18,P<0.032);更严格地遵医嘱使用控制药物(t(77)= -3.24,P<0.002),并且更频繁地定期看医生(t(78)= -1.80,P<0.038,单尾)。
判断技能工具有助于识别哮喘患者对健康信息的使用情况,并揭示这种使用可能如何影响某些自我管理实践。对公共卫生的意义患者的健康素养对其健康行为和健康结果有很大影响。因此,在医疗环境中测量健康素养以确定针对患者的最有效方法变得越来越普遍。哮喘判断技能的测量有助于更深入地了解患者在哮喘控制关键主题方面的哮喘自我管理情况,并且具有评估这种特定疾病所需特定能力的优势,这反过来有利于将使用该工具的研究结果转化为直接满足哮喘患者需求的策略。