Kisbu-Sakarya Yasemin, MacKinnon David P, Miočević Milica
Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2014 May;49(3):261-268. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.903162.
The distribution of the product has several useful applications. One of these applications is its use to form confidence intervals for the indirect effect as the product of 2 regression coefficients. The purpose of this article is to investigate how the moments of the distribution of the product explain normal theory mediation confidence interval coverage and imbalance. Values of the critical ratio for each random variable are used to demonstrate how the moments of the distribution of the product change across values of the critical ratio observed in research studies. Results of the simulation study showed that as skewness in absolute value increases, coverage decreases. And as skewness in absolute value and kurtosis increases, imbalance increases. The difference between testing the significance of the indirect effect using the normal theory versus the asymmetric distribution of the product is further illustrated with a real data example. This article is the first study to show the direct link between the distribution of the product and indirect effect confidence intervals and clarifies the results of previous simulation studies by showing why normal theory confidence intervals for indirect effects are often less accurate than those obtained from the asymmetric distribution of the product or from resampling methods.
该乘积的分布有几个有用的应用。其中一个应用是用于构建间接效应的置信区间,间接效应是两个回归系数的乘积。本文的目的是研究该乘积分布的矩如何解释正态理论中介置信区间的覆盖率和不平衡性。每个随机变量的临界比的值用于展示该乘积分布的矩如何随着研究中观察到的临界比的值而变化。模拟研究结果表明,随着绝对值偏度的增加,覆盖率降低。并且随着绝对值偏度和峰度的增加,不平衡性增加。通过一个实际数据示例进一步说明了使用正态理论检验间接效应的显著性与该乘积的非对称分布之间的差异。本文是第一项展示乘积分布与间接效应置信区间之间直接联系的研究,并通过说明为什么间接效应的正态理论置信区间通常不如从该乘积的非对称分布或重采样方法获得的置信区间准确,从而阐明了先前模拟研究的结果。