Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Oct;16(4):501-13. doi: 10.1037/a0023002.
This paper examines the mechanisms by which PHLAME (Promoting Healthy Lifestyles: Alternative Models' Effects), a health promotion intervention, improved healthy eating and exercise behavior among firefighters, a population at high risk for health problems due to occupational hazards. In a randomized trial, 397 firefighters participated in either the PHLAME team intervention with their work shift or a control condition. Intervention sessions taught benefits of a healthy diet and regular exercise, and sought to improve social norms and social support from coworkers for healthy behavior. At posttest, team intervention participants had increased their fruit and vegetable consumption as compared to control participants. An increase in knowledge of fruit and vegetable benefits and improved dietary coworker norms partially mediated these effects. Exercise habits and VO2 max were related to targeted mediators but were not significantly changed by the team intervention. Partial support was found for both the action and conceptual theories underlying the intervention. Our findings illustrate how an effective program's process can be deconstructed to understand the underpinnings of behavior change and refine interventions. Further, fire stations may improve the health of firefighters by emphasizing the benefits of healthy diet and exercise behaviors while also encouraging behavior change by coworkers as a whole.
本研究旨在探讨 PHLAME(促进健康生活方式:替代模式的效果)干预措施的作用机制,该干预措施旨在改善消防员的健康饮食和运动行为,消防员由于职业危害而面临健康问题的高风险。在一项随机试验中,397 名消防员参加了 PHLAME 团队干预(与工作班次一起)或对照组。干预课程教授了健康饮食和定期运动的好处,并努力改善同事对健康行为的社会规范和社会支持。在测试后,与对照组相比,团队干预组参与者增加了水果和蔬菜的摄入量。对水果和蔬菜益处的认识提高以及饮食方面同事规范的改善部分解释了这些效果。运动习惯和最大摄氧量与目标介导物有关,但团队干预并未显著改变这些习惯和最大摄氧量。干预措施的理论基础和行动理论得到了部分支持。我们的研究结果说明了如何解构有效计划的过程,以了解行为改变的基础,并改进干预措施。此外,消防站可以通过强调健康饮食和运动行为的好处来改善消防员的健康状况,同时鼓励整个同事群体进行行为改变。