Suppr超能文献

基于跨学科团队研究的四阶段模型:目标、团队流程与策略

A Four-Phase Model of Transdisciplinary Team-Based Research: Goals, Team Processes, and Strategies.

作者信息

Hall Kara L, Vogel Amanda L, Stipelman Brooke, Stokols Daniel, Morgan Glen, Gehlert Sarah

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20850.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec 1;2(4):415-430. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0167-y.

Abstract

The complexity of social and public health challenges has led to burgeoning interest and investments in cross-disciplinary team-based research, and particularly in transdisciplinary (TD) team-based research. TD research aims to integrate and ultimately extend beyond discipline-specific concepts, approaches, and methods to accelerate innovations and progress toward solving complex real-world problems. While TD research offers the promise of novel, wide-reaching and important discoveries, it also introduces unique challenges. In particular, today's investigators are generally trained in unidisciplinary approaches, and may have little training in, or exposure to, the scientific skills and team processes necessary to collaborate successfully in teams of colleagues from widely disparate disciplines and fields. Yet these skills are essential to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of TD team-based research. In the current article we propose a model of TD team-based research that includes four relatively distinct phases: development, conceptualization, implementation, and translation. Drawing on the science of team science (SciTS) field, as well as the findings from previous research on group dynamics and organizational behavior, we identify key scientific goals and team processes that occur in each phase and across multiple phases. We then provide real-world exemplars for each phase that highlight strategies for successfully meeting the goals and engaging in the team processes that are hallmarks of that phase. We conclude by discussing the relevance of the model for TD team-based research initiatives, funding to support these initiatives, and future empirical research that aims to better understand the processes and outcomes of TD team-based research.

摘要

社会和公共卫生挑战的复杂性引发了人们对跨学科团队研究,尤其是跨学科(TD)团队研究的兴趣和投资不断增长。TD研究旨在整合并最终超越特定学科的概念、方法和手段,以加速创新并推动解决复杂现实世界问题的进展。虽然TD研究有望带来新颖、广泛且重要的发现,但它也带来了独特的挑战。特别是,如今的研究人员通常接受的是单学科方法的培训,对于与来自截然不同学科和领域的同事成功协作所需的科学技能和团队流程,可能几乎没有接受过培训或接触过。然而,这些技能对于最大限度地提高基于TD团队的研究的效率和效果至关重要。在本文中,我们提出了一个基于TD团队的研究模型,该模型包括四个相对不同的阶段:发展、概念化、实施和转化。借鉴团队科学(SciTS)领域的知识以及先前关于群体动力学和组织行为研究的结果,我们确定了每个阶段以及多个阶段中出现的关键科学目标和团队流程。然后,我们为每个阶段提供了实际示例,突出了成功实现目标以及参与该阶段标志性团队流程的策略。我们通过讨论该模型与基于TD团队的研究计划的相关性、支持这些计划的资金以及旨在更好地理解基于TD团队的研究的过程和结果的未来实证研究来得出结论。

相似文献

1
A Four-Phase Model of Transdisciplinary Team-Based Research: Goals, Team Processes, and Strategies.
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec 1;2(4):415-430. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0167-y.
4
Is the juice worth the squeeze? Transdisciplinary team science in bladder health.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Jun;39(5):1601-1611. doi: 10.1002/nau.24357. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
7
Bringing Transdisciplinary Aging Research From Theory to Practice.
Gerontologist. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):159-168. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa214.
8
The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration.
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.
9
Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity.
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.007.
10
Bringing Together a Transdisciplinary Team to Create and Advance a Shared Vision for Research and Support for Siblings of Youth With Cancer.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jan-Feb;40(1):34-42. doi: 10.1177/27527530221121727. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A Transdisciplinary Analysis of Domestic Violence Homicides in Harris County, Texas (2016-2020).
Homicide Stud. 2023 Nov;27(4):472-492. doi: 10.1177/10887679231182331. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
3
Introducing CRIS-A unified framework for systematic literature searches across disciplines.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 13;13:1489161. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1489161. eCollection 2025.
4
A guide to developing harmonized research workflows in a team science context.
Exp Neurol. 2025 Jun 5;392:115333. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2025.115333.
6
A transdisciplinary dual degree curriculum yields novel and successful learning outcomes: early lessons from training physicianeers.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 28;12:1520976. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1520976. eCollection 2025.
8
Team science competencies for clinical research professionals: A multileveled Delphi approach.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr 1;8(1):e112. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.509. eCollection 2024.
9
Towards healthy urbanism: inclusive, equitable and sustainable (THRIVES) - an urban design and planning framework from theory to praxis.
Cities Health. 2022 Sep 3;6(5):974-992. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1769527. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
10
Building a Transdisciplinary Team to Prevent Intimate Partner Homicide: A Research Note.
Homicide Stud. 2023 Nov;27(4):454-471. doi: 10.1177/10887679231178786. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Dec;7(3):77-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x. Epub 2006 Dec 1.
2
Assessing the value of team science: a study comparing center- and investigator-initiated grants.
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.011.
3
The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis.
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):360-90. doi: 10.1037/a0024844. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
4
Using community-based participatory research to ameliorate cancer disparities.
Health Soc Work. 2010 Nov;35(4):302-9. doi: 10.1093/hsw/35.4.302.
5
A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science.
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Sep 15;2(49):49cm24. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399.
6
Using team science to address health disparities: MacArthur network as case example.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:252-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05335.x.
8
Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis.
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Mar;94(2):535-46. doi: 10.1037/a0013773.
10
The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration.
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验