Foulds James A, Douglas Sellman J, Adamson Simon J, Boden Joseph M, Mulder Roger T, Joyce Peter R
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 15;174:503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.052. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
Depression commonly co-occurs with alcohol use disorders but predictors of depression treatment outcome in patients with both conditions are not well established.
Outpatients with alcohol dependence and major depression (n=138) were prescribed naltrexone and randomized to citalopram or placebo for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week naturalistic outcome phase. General linear mixed models examined predictors of Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score over 24 weeks. Predictors included whether depression was independent or substance-induced, and demographic, alcohol use, and personality variables (Temperament and Character Inventory subscales).
Most improvement in drinking and depression occurred between baseline and week 3. During follow-up, patients with substance-induced depression reduced their drinking more and they had better depression outcomes than those with independent depression. However, greater reduction in drinking was associated with better depression outcomes for both independent and substance-induced groups, while antidepressant therapy had no effect for either group. Baseline demographic and alcohol use variables did not predict depression outcomes. Among personality variables, high self-directedness was a strong predictor of better depression outcomes.
Subjects were not abstinent at baseline. The influence of naltrexone on depression outcomes could not be tested.
Alcohol dependent patients with substance-induced depression have better short term depression outcomes than those with independent depression, but this is largely because they reduce their drinking more during treatment.
抑郁症常与酒精使用障碍同时出现,但对于同时患有这两种疾病的患者,抑郁症治疗结果的预测因素尚未明确。
对138名酒精依赖和重度抑郁症门诊患者开具纳曲酮,并随机分为接受西酞普兰或安慰剂治疗12周,随后进入为期12周的自然转归阶段。采用一般线性混合模型研究24周内蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)评分的预测因素。预测因素包括抑郁症是独立的还是物质所致的,以及人口统计学、酒精使用和人格变量(气质与性格问卷分量表)。
饮酒和抑郁症状的最大改善发生在基线至第3周之间。在随访期间,物质所致抑郁症患者饮酒量减少更多,且抑郁结局优于独立抑郁症患者。然而,饮酒量减少更多与独立抑郁症组和物质所致抑郁症组的抑郁结局改善均相关,而抗抑郁治疗对两组均无效果。基线人口统计学和酒精使用变量不能预测抑郁结局。在人格变量中,高自我导向性是抑郁结局改善的有力预测因素。
受试者在基线时并非戒酒状态。无法测试纳曲酮对抑郁结局的影响。
物质所致抑郁症的酒精依赖患者短期抑郁结局优于独立抑郁症患者,但这很大程度上是因为他们在治疗期间饮酒量减少更多。