• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文字还是数字?全科医疗中概率表述的评估

Words or numbers? The evaluation of probability expressions in general practice.

作者信息

O'Brien B J

出版信息

J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Mar;39(320):98-100.

PMID:2555504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1711769/
Abstract

A sample of 56 general practitioners were asked to rate, on a percentage scale, 23 words or phrases which denote frequency or likelihood. The hypothetical context of the exercise was that of communicating to patients the probability of a side-effect (headache) arising from an unspecified prescription medicine. Median phrase ratings ranged from 'never' at 0% to 'certain' at 95% with a 50% rating given to the phrase 'reasonable chance'. Despite relatively large variance in ratings between respondents, the median ratings of a number of phrases were similar, and some identical, to other studies from different medical professionals. Although the clinical context in which a given expression of probability is used may affect its meaning, the results are encouraging and suggest that phrases denoting likelihood might be systematically codified to enhance communication between doctor and patient. To move towards this objective more research is needed to evaluate how patients interpret expressions of probability, and the relative effectiveness of different modes of communicating likelihood.

摘要

56名全科医生被要求以百分比为尺度,对23个表示频率或可能性的单词或短语进行评分。该练习的假设情境是向患者传达某种未指明的处方药产生副作用(头痛)的概率。短语评分中位数范围从表示“从不”的0%到表示“肯定”的95%,“合理机会”这一短语的评分为50%。尽管受访者之间的评分存在相对较大的差异,但一些短语的中位数评分与来自不同医学专业人员的其他研究相似,有些甚至相同。虽然使用特定概率表述的临床情境可能会影响其含义,但结果令人鼓舞,表明表示可能性的短语可能会被系统地编纂,以加强医患之间的沟通。为了朝着这一目标前进,需要更多的研究来评估患者如何理解概率表述,以及传达可能性的不同方式的相对有效性。

相似文献

1
Words or numbers? The evaluation of probability expressions in general practice.文字还是数字?全科医疗中概率表述的评估
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Mar;39(320):98-100.
2
How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability.医学专业人员如何评估概率表述。
N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 18;315(12):740-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198609183151206.
3
Adolescents' misinterpretation of health risk probability expressions.青少年对健康风险概率表述的误解。
Pediatrics. 1995 May;95(5):713-6.
4
Influences on patients' ratings of physicians: Physicians demographics and personality.对患者对医生评分的影响:医生的人口统计学特征和个性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Feb;65(2):270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
5
Reasonable suspicion: a study of Pennsylvania pediatricians regarding child abuse.合理怀疑:宾夕法尼亚州儿科医生对虐待儿童问题的一项研究。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):e5-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2649.
6
A national probability survey of American Medical Association gynecologists and primary care physicians concerning menopause.一项针对美国医学协会妇科医生和初级保健医生进行的关于更年期的全国概率调查。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 1):693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.080.
7
[Autonomy attitudes in the treatment compliance of a cohort of subjects with continuous psychotropic drug administration].[一组持续接受精神药物治疗的受试者治疗依从性中的自主性态度]
Encephale. 2002 Sep-Oct;28(5 Pt 1):389-96.
8
Involving patients in decision making and communicating risk: a longitudinal evaluation of doctors' attitudes and confidence during a randomized trial.让患者参与决策并告知风险:一项关于医生在随机试验期间态度和信心的纵向评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 Aug;10(3):431-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2004.00502.x.
9
Doctor-patient interaction in Finnish primary health care as perceived by first year medical students.芬兰医科大学一年级学生所感知到的芬兰初级卫生保健中的医患互动。
BMC Med Educ. 2005 Sep 15;5:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-34.
10
The impact of gender stereotypes on the evaluation of general practitioners' communication skills: an experimental study using transcripts of physician-patient encounters.性别刻板印象对全科医生沟通技巧评估的影响:一项使用医患交流记录的实验研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.013. Epub 2007 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of human and GPT-4 use of probabilistic phrases in a coordination game.人类和 GPT-4 在协调游戏中使用概率短语的比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 21;14(1):6835. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56740-9.
2
Use of modifying phrases in surgical pathology reports: is there a different understanding between pathologists and treating physicians?外科病理学报告中修饰语的使用:病理学家和治疗医师的理解是否存在差异?
Virchows Arch. 2022 Nov;481(5):759-766. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03407-3. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
3
Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted.医学写作中表示数值概率的单词具有歧义并被误解。
JSLS. 2021 Jul-Sep;25(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00034.
4
A little 'suspect'?有点可疑?
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Feb;69(679):85. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701105.
5
Reporting, presentation and wording of recommendations in clinical practice guideline for gout: a systematic analysis.报告、呈现和推荐用语在痛风临床实践指南中的分析:系统分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):e024315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024315.
6
"Talking About Chance": The Presentation of Risk Information During Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.《谈机遇》:乳腺癌和卵巢癌遗传咨询过程中的风险信息呈现
J Genet Couns. 1997 Sep;6(3):269-86. doi: 10.1023/A:1025624221369.
7
Hedging their mets: the use of uncertainty terms in clinical documents and its potential implications when sharing the documents with patients.规避风险:临床文档中不确定性术语的使用及其在与患者共享文档时的潜在影响。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:321-30. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
8
How "should" we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community.我们“应该”如何撰写指南推荐意见?临床实践指南中道义术语的解读:医疗卫生服务界调查
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):509-13. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.032565. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
9
Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice.数字素养的临床意义:理论与实践。
Ann Behav Med. 2008 Jun;35(3):261-74. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9037-8. Epub 2008 Aug 2.
10
The effect of qualitative vs. quantitative presentation of probability estimates on patient decision-making: a randomized trial.概率估计的定性与定量呈现方式对患者决策的影响:一项随机试验。
Health Expect. 2002 Sep;5(3):246-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00188.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Expressions of probability: words and numbers.概率的表达:文字与数字。
N Engl J Med. 1980 Feb 14;302(7):411. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198002143020718.
2
Between never and always.
N Engl J Med. 1981 Oct 29;305(18):1097-8.
3
On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.关于替代疗法偏好的引出。
N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1259-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205273062103.
4
Assessment of patients' preferences for therapeutic outcomes.
Med Decis Making. 1981;1(1):29-39. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8100100105.
5
Numbers are better than words. Verbal specifications of frequency have no place in medicine.
Am J Med. 1983 Jun;74(6):1061-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90819-7.
6
What do we mean by "usually"?我们所说的“通常”是什么意思?
Lancet. 1980 May 17;1(8177):1094. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91544-5.
7
How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability.医学专业人员如何评估概率表述。
N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 18;315(12):740-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198609183151206.
8
Verbal and numerical estimates of probability in therapeutic contexts.
Soc Sci Med (1967). 1979 May;13A(3):277-82.