• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Brief Moral Decision-Making Questionnaire: A Rasch-derived short form of the Greene dilemmas.

作者信息

Carmona-Perera Martina, Caracuel Alfonso, Pérez-García Miguel, Verdejo-García Antonio

机构信息

Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment.

Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2015 Jun;27(2):424-32. doi: 10.1037/pas0000049. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000049
PMID:25558971
Abstract

In this study, we developed the Brief Moral Decision-Making Questionnaire (BrMoD) as a standardized brief form of the dilemmas compiled by Greene and colleagues (Greene, Sommerville, Nystrom, Darley, & Cohen, 2001). An initial Rasch analysis was conducted over responses to 60 dilemmas to retain the most appropriate items. The psychometric properties of the 32-item brief instrument were determined in a community sample of 133 individuals using analyses from both the Rasch model and the classical test theory. The BrMoD scores showed appropriate reliability and construct validity. Differences between dilemma categories proposed by Greene et al. were observed in the BrMoD by measuring the difficulty of decisions and response times of the participants. In addition, there was no differential item functioning by the demographic variables. Therefore, the BrMoD is a good tool for assessing moral decision making in research or professional fields.

摘要

相似文献

1
Brief Moral Decision-Making Questionnaire: A Rasch-derived short form of the Greene dilemmas.
Psychol Assess. 2015 Jun;27(2):424-32. doi: 10.1037/pas0000049. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
2
Oscillatory correlates of moral decision-making: Effect of personality.道德决策的振荡相关性:人格的影响。
Soc Neurosci. 2016;11(3):233-48. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1072110. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
3
Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: the brief young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire.迈向对大学生酒精问题连续体的高效全面测量:简短的青年成人酒精后果问卷
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Jul;29(7):1180-9. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000171940.95813.a5.
4
European Portuguese adaptation and validation of dilemmas used to assess moral decision-making.用于评估道德决策的困境的欧洲葡萄牙语改编及验证
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2018 Apr 5;40(1):38-46. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0022. Print 2018 Mar.
5
Initial psychometric evaluation of the Moral Injury Questionnaire--Military version.道德伤害问卷(军事版)的初始心理测量评估
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2015 Jan-Feb;22(1):54-63. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1866. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
6
If it makes you feel bad, don't do it! Egoistic rather than altruistic empathy modulates neural and behavioral responses in moral dilemmas.如果这让你感觉不好,那就别做!在道德困境中,利己而非利他的同理心会调节神经和行为反应。
Physiol Behav. 2014 May 10;130:127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
7
Emotional Intelligence and Nurse Recruitment: Rasch and confirmatory factor analysis of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire short form.情商与护士招聘:特质情商问卷简版的拉施分析和验证性因素分析
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Dec;71(12):2936-49. doi: 10.1111/jan.12746. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
8
Construction of a scale for measuring development of moral judgement.道德判断发展测量量表的构建。
Psychol Rep. 2004 Apr;94(2):613-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.2.613-618.
9
[Psychometric properties of the French version of the How I Think Questionnaire].[《我如何思考问卷》法语版的心理测量学特性]
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
10
Psychometric Validation of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale.10项Connor-Davidson韧性量表的心理测量学验证
J Appl Meas. 2017;18(2):122-136.

引用本文的文献

1
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.