Kyle Meghann E, Wang James C, Shin Jennifer J
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Mar;152(3):393-409. doi: 10.1177/0194599814564533. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
To perform a systematic review evaluating the association between sensorineural hearing loss and (1) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as a class, (2) NSAIDs available over the counter, (3) NSAIDs in short intravenous courses, (4) prescription NSAIDs utilized by patients without systemic inflammatory conditions, (5) prescription NSAIDs in patients with arthritides, and (6) acetaminophen with and without concomitant narcotic usage.
Computerized searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were updated through May 2014, along with manual searches and inquiries to topic experts.
The systematic review was performed according to an a priori protocol. Data extraction was performed by 2 independent investigators, and it focused on relevant audiologic measurements, methodological elements related to risk of bias, and potential confounders.
The 23 criterion-meeting studies included a total of 92,532 participants, with mixed results. Sulindac was the only specific agent to have been studied with formal audiometry in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in which hearing was the reported primary outcome: Although an effect was seen in the unadjusted analysis (pure tone threshold>15 dB, 9.3% vs 2.9%; relative risk [RR], 3.2; confidence interval [CI], 1.09-9.55; P=.02), the effect dissipated in the adjusted analysis (P=.09). There was a significant effect on self-reported hearing loss from NSAIDs as a class (RR, 1.21; CI, 1.11-1.33), ibuprofen (RR, 1.13; CI, 1.06-1.19), and acetaminophen (RR, 1.21; CI, 1.11-1.33), but no formal audiometric data confirm or refute this suggested effect. Audiometry has demonstrated profound loss in some instances of acetaminophen-narcotic combination ingestions.
Data are varied regarding the impact of NSAIDs and acetaminophen on population hearing health.
进行一项系统评价,评估感音神经性听力损失与以下因素之间的关联:(1)作为一类药物的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs);(2)非处方NSAIDs;(3)短期静脉使用的NSAIDs;(4)无全身性炎症疾病患者使用的处方NSAIDs;(5)关节炎患者使用的处方NSAIDs;(6)使用和未使用麻醉性镇痛药的对乙酰氨基酚。
对PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆进行计算机检索,并更新至2014年5月,同时进行手工检索并咨询主题专家。
根据预先制定的方案进行系统评价。由2名独立研究人员进行数据提取,重点关注相关的听力学测量、与偏倚风险相关的方法学要素以及潜在混杂因素。
23项符合标准的研究共纳入92532名参与者,结果不一。舒林酸是唯一在以听力为主要报告结局的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验中通过正式听力测定进行研究的特定药物:尽管在未校正分析中观察到有影响(纯音阈值>15 dB,9.3%对2.9%;相对风险[RR],3.2;置信区间[CI],1.09 - 9.55;P = 0.02),但在校正分析中该影响消失(P = 0.09)。作为一类药物的NSAIDs(RR,1.21;CI,1.11 - 1.33)、布洛芬(RR,1.13;CI,1.06 - 1.19)和对乙酰氨基酚(RR,1.21;CI,1.11 - 1.33)对自我报告的听力损失有显著影响,但尚无正式的听力测定数据证实或反驳这种影响。听力测定已证实在某些对乙酰氨基酚 - 麻醉性镇痛药联合摄入的情况下会出现严重听力损失。
关于NSAIDs和对乙酰氨基酚对人群听力健康的影响,数据存在差异。