Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts;
Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Pediatrics. 2015 Feb;135(2):e296-304. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2888. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
To evaluate the effect of a clinic-based screening and referral system (Well Child Care, Evaluation, Community Resources, Advocacy, Referral, Education [WE CARE]) on families' receipt of community-based resources for unmet basic needs.
We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial at 8 urban community health centers, recruiting mothers of healthy infants. In the 4 WE CARE clinics, mothers completed a self-report screening instrument that assessed needs for child care, education, employment, food security, household heat, and housing. Providers made referrals for families; staff provided requisite applications and telephoned referred mothers within 1 month. Families at the 4 control community health centers received the usual care. We analyzed the results with generalized mixed-effect models.
Three hundred thirty-six mothers were enrolled in the study (168 per arm). The majority of families had household incomes <$20,000 (57%), and 68% had ≥ 2 unmet basic needs. More WE CARE mothers received ≥ 1 referral at the index visit (70% vs 8%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 29.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7-59.6). At the 12-month visit, more WE CARE mothers had enrolled in a new community resource (39% vs 24%; aOR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.7). WE CARE mothers had greater odds of being employed (aOR = 44.4; 95% CI, 9.8-201.4). WE CARE children had greater odds of being in child care (aOR = 6.3; 95% CI, 1.5-26.0). WE CARE families had greater odds of receiving fuel assistance (aOR = 11.9; 95% CI, 1.7-82.9) and lower odds of being in a homeless shelter (aOR = 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.9).
Systematically screening and referring for social determinants during well child care can lead to the receipt of more community resources for families.
评估基于诊所的筛查和转介系统(儿童保健、评估、社区资源、倡导、转介、教育[WE CARE])对家庭获得未满足基本需求的社区资源的效果。
我们在 8 家城市社区卫生中心进行了一项基于群组的随机对照试验,招募健康婴儿的母亲。在 4 家 WE CARE 诊所中,母亲们完成了一份自我报告的筛查工具,评估了儿童保育、教育、就业、食品安全、家庭取暖和住房的需求。提供者为家庭转介;工作人员在 1 个月内为转介母亲提供必要的申请并打电话。4 家对照社区卫生中心的家庭接受常规护理。我们使用广义混合效应模型分析了结果。
共有 336 名母亲参加了研究(每组 168 名)。大多数家庭的家庭收入<$20,000(57%),68%有≥2 项未满足的基本需求。更多 WE CARE 母亲在就诊时获得了≥1 次转介(70% vs 8%;调整后的优势比[aOR] = 29.6;95%置信区间[CI],14.7-59.6)。在 12 个月的随访中,更多 WE CARE 母亲注册了新的社区资源(39% vs 24%;aOR = 2.1;95% CI,1.2-3.7)。WE CARE 母亲更有可能就业(aOR = 44.4;95% CI,9.8-201.4)。WE CARE 儿童更有可能入托(aOR = 6.3;95% CI,1.5-26.0)。WE CARE 家庭获得燃料援助的可能性更大(aOR = 11.9;95% CI,1.7-82.9),入住无家可归者收容所的可能性更小(aOR = 0.2;95% CI,0.1-0.9)。
在儿童保健期间系统地筛查和转介社会决定因素可以为家庭获得更多的社区资源。