• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正畸患者的牙龈反应:自结扎托槽与传统托槽的比较研究。

Gingival response in orthodontic patients: Comparative study between self-ligating and conventional brackets.

作者信息

Folco Alejandra A, Benítez-Rogé Sandra C, Iglesias Marina, Calabrese Diana, Pelizardi Cristina, Rosa Alcira, Brusca Marisa I, Hecht Pedro, Mateu María E

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014;27(3):120-4. doi: 10.1590/S1852-48342014000300004.

DOI:10.1590/S1852-48342014000300004
PMID:25560690
Abstract

Orthodontic brackets contribute to the accumulation of bacterial plaque on tooth surfaces because they hinder oral hygiene. In contrast to conventional brackets, self-ligating brackets do not require additional parts to support the arches, thus improving dental hygiene. The aim of this study was to compare the gingival response in orthodontic patients wearing self-ligating or conventional brackets. A sample of 22 patients aged 16 to 30 years was divided into two groups: Group A, treated with selfligating brackets (Damon system) and Group B, treated with conventional brackets (Roth technique). The following were assessed during the treatment: Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI) and Probing Depth (PD), and sub-gingival samples were taken from teeth 14/24 for microbiological observation. No statistically significant difference was found between Groups A and B; p>0.05 (sign-ranked) or between PI, GI and PD at the different times (Friedman's Analysis of Variance), even though the indices were found to increase at 14 days, particularly for self-ligating brackets. The quantity and quality of microorganisms present were compatible with health on days 0, 28 and 56. As from day 14 there is a predominance of microbiota compatible with gingivitis in both groups. In the samples studied, orthodontic treatment increases bacterial plaque and inflammatory gingival response, but gingival-periodontal health can be maintained with adequate basic therapy. Self-ligating and conventional brackets produced similar gingival response.

摘要

正畸托槽会阻碍口腔卫生,导致牙面细菌菌斑堆积。与传统托槽不同,自锁托槽不需要额外部件来支撑弓丝,从而改善了口腔卫生。本研究的目的是比较佩戴自锁托槽或传统托槽的正畸患者的牙龈反应。选取22名年龄在16至30岁之间的患者作为样本,分为两组:A组采用自锁托槽(Damon系统)治疗,B组采用传统托槽(Roth技术)治疗。在治疗期间评估以下指标:菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)和探诊深度(PD),并从14/24号牙采集龈下样本进行微生物学观察。A组和B组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异;p>0.05(符号秩和检验),不同时间的PI、GI和PD之间也未发现差异(Friedman方差分析),尽管这些指标在第14天时有所增加,尤其是自锁托槽组。在第0、28和56天时,存在的微生物数量和质量与健康状况相符。从第14天起,两组中与牙龈炎相符的微生物群占主导地位。在所研究的样本中,正畸治疗会增加细菌菌斑和牙龈炎症反应,但通过适当的基础治疗可以维持牙龈-牙周健康。自锁托槽和传统托槽产生的牙龈反应相似。

相似文献

1
Gingival response in orthodontic patients: Comparative study between self-ligating and conventional brackets.正畸患者的牙龈反应:自结扎托槽与传统托槽的比较研究。
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014;27(3):120-4. doi: 10.1590/S1852-48342014000300004.
2
Alterations in plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation promoted by treatment with self-ligating and conventional orthodontic brackets.自锁式和传统正畸托槽治疗对菌斑堆积和牙龈炎症的影响
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Mar-Apr;20(2):35-41. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.035-041.oar.
3
Microbiological analysis of gingivitis in pediatric patients under orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗的儿科患者牙龈炎的微生物分析。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2011 Dec;12(4):210-4.
4
Effect of a self-etching adhesive containing an antibacterial monomer on clinical periodontal parameters and subgingival microbiologic composition in orthodontic patients.自酸蚀黏接剂中含有的抗菌单体对正畸患者临床牙周参数和龈下微生物组成的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct;140(4):e147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.022.
5
Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.青少年主动自锁式与被动自锁式矫治器和传统矫治器的排齐效率和间隙关闭比较:一项单中心随机对照试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):569-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.024.
6
The impact of oral contraceptives on women's periodontal health and the subgingival occurrence of aggressive periodontopathogens and Candida species.口服避孕药对女性牙周健康的影响以及侵袭性牙周致病菌和念珠菌属在龈下的发生。
J Periodontol. 2010 Jul;81(7):1010-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090575.
7
[Comparison of periodontal indices and Porphyromonas gingivalis between conventional and self-ligating brackets].[传统托槽与自锁托槽的牙周指数及牙龈卟啉单胞菌的比较]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Jun;31(3):228-31.
8
Short-term effect of removal of fixed orthodontic appliances on gingival health and subgingival microbiota: a prospective cohort study.去除固定正畸矫治器对牙龈健康和龈下微生物群的短期影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73(7):496-502. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2014.993701. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
9
Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment.传统正畸治疗和自锁正畸治疗期间疼痛的发生率及类型
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Aug;31(4):380-4. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp003. Epub 2009 May 22.
10
Gingival crevicular fluid volume and periodontal parameters alterations after use of conventional and self-ligating brackets.使用传统托槽和自锁托槽后龈沟液量及牙周参数的变化
J Orthod. 2016 Dec;43(4):260-267. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2016.1221214. Epub 2016 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of dental plaque reduction using microcurrent-emitting toothbrushes in orthodontic patients: a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial.应用微电流牙刷减少正畸患者牙菌斑的效果评价:一项随机、双盲、交叉临床试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 27;14(1):12126. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60753-9.
2
Effect of conventional and self-ligating brackets on periodontal health. Systematic review and meta-analysis.传统托槽与自锁托槽对牙周健康的影响。系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Mar 1;16(3):e358-e366. doi: 10.4317/jced.61378. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
White Spots: Prevention in Orthodontics-Systematic Review of the Literature.
白点:正畸预防——文献系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 21;20(8):5608. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085608.
4
Microbial colonisation associated with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a systematic review.与传统和自锁托槽相关的微生物定植:系统评价。
J Orthod. 2022 Jun;49(2):151-162. doi: 10.1177/14653125211056023. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
5
Oral colonization by species in orthodontic patients before, during and after treatment with fixed appliances: A prospective controlled trial.固定矫治器治疗正畸患者前、治疗期间及治疗后口腔内特定菌种的定植情况:一项前瞻性对照试验。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Nov 1;12(11):e1071-e1077. doi: 10.4317/jced.57565. eCollection 2020 Nov.
6
Clinical and Salivary Findings in Patients with Metal and Crystalline Conventional and Self-Ligating Orthodontic Brackets.使用金属及晶体材质的传统和自锁正畸托槽患者的临床及唾液检测结果
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019 Sep;53(3):224-230. doi: 10.15644/asc53/3/4.