Cardoso Mauricio de Almeida, Saraiva Patrícia Pinto, Maltagliati Liliana Ávila, Rhoden Fernando Kleinübing, Costa Carla Cristina Alvarenga, Normando David, Capelozza Filho Leopoldino
Department of Oral Biology, Universidade Sagrado Coração, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
School of Dentistry, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Mar-Apr;20(2):35-41. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.035-041.oar.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate, comparatively, the periodontal response during orthodontic treatment performed with self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Sixteen Caucasian individuals of both sexes, aged between 12 and 16 years old and in permanent dentition were selected. Eight individuals were treated with conventional brackets installed on the lower dental arch and self-ligating brackets on the upper arch. Another eight individuals received self-ligating brackets in the lower arch and conventional brackets in the upper arch. The subjects received material and instructions for oral hygiene. Visible plaque index (VPI), gingival bleeding index (GBI) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were evaluated just after installation of orthodontic appliances, and 30, 60 and 180 days later. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare differences between groups (self-ligating and conventional), two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test was used to assess CAL at each site of each tooth. Significance level was set at 5%.
No significant changes were found with regard to the assessed parameters (VPI, GBI and CAL) in either one of the systems.
No significant changes were found with regard to the periodontal response to orthodontic treatment for the variables assessed and between subjects receiving passive self-ligating and conventional brackets. All individuals had received oral hygiene instructions and had their periodontal conditions monitored.
本研究的目的是比较自锁托槽和传统托槽在正畸治疗期间的牙周反应。
选取16名年龄在12至16岁之间、恒牙列的白种人个体,男女不限。8名个体在下牙弓安装传统托槽,上牙弓安装自锁托槽进行治疗。另外8名个体在下牙弓使用自锁托槽,上牙弓使用传统托槽。受试者接受口腔卫生用品和指导。在安装正畸矫治器后以及30、60和180天后评估可见菌斑指数(VPI)、牙龈出血指数(GBI)和临床附着水平(CAL)。采用曼-惠特尼检验比较组间差异(自锁和传统),采用双向方差分析并随后进行Tukey检验评估每颗牙齿每个部位的CAL。显著性水平设定为5%。
两个系统中评估的参数(VPI、GBI和CAL)均未发现显著变化。
对于接受被动自锁托槽和传统托槽治疗的受试者,在评估的变量方面,正畸治疗的牙周反应未发现显著变化。所有个体均接受了口腔卫生指导并对其牙周状况进行了监测。