Baghaipour Mohammad Reza, Steen Carlsson Katarina
Comprehensive Hemophilia Care Center, Tehran, Iran.
Eur J Haematol. 2015 Feb;94 Suppl 77:30-7. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12499.
One important complication of patients with severe haemophilia A is the formation of inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the treatment of choice for patients with inhibitors, but this approach is successful in about 60% of patients. Treatment of acute bleeding in patients with inhibitors is one of the greatest challenges in haemophilia management and is costly. Bypassing agents are the mainstay of treatment in these patients. The aims of this study were to review the most recent publications concerning the costs of inhibitor treatment. We conducted a literature review using PubMed which yielded 63 papers analysing the costs of inhibitor management of which 12 were suitable for our study. Four of eight studies supported the use of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) with lower costs, but the remaining four studies showed that recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) had a lower average treatment cost. Of four ITI studies, two supported lifelong cost-effectiveness of ITI vs. bypassing agents and the remaining two papers showed a high cost of inhibitor treatment. Dosages, time between onset of bleeding and treatment, patient characteristics and the price of drugs are some of the important issues that should be considered for further studies.
重度甲型血友病患者的一个重要并发症是产生针对凝血因子 VIII(FVIII)的抑制性抗体。免疫耐受诱导(ITI)是有抑制物患者的首选治疗方法,但这种方法在约 60%的患者中取得成功。有抑制物患者的急性出血治疗是血友病管理中最大的挑战之一,且成本高昂。旁路制剂是这些患者的主要治疗手段。本研究的目的是回顾有关抑制物治疗成本的最新出版物。我们使用 PubMed 进行了文献综述,共检索到 63 篇分析抑制物管理成本的论文,其中 12 篇适合我们的研究。八项研究中的四项支持使用活化凝血酶原复合物浓缩剂(aPCC),其成本较低,但其余四项研究表明重组凝血因子 VIIa(rFVIIa)的平均治疗成本更低。在四项 ITI 研究中,两项支持 ITI 与旁路制剂相比具有终身成本效益,其余两篇论文显示抑制物治疗成本高昂。剂量、出血发作与治疗之间的时间、患者特征以及药物价格是进一步研究应考虑的一些重要问题。