McKay Carly D, Meeuwisse Willem H, Emery Carolyn A
Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre (SIPRC), Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
Can J Public Health. 2014 Nov 5;105(6):e445-9. doi: 10.17269/cjph.105.4653.
Body checking is a significant risk factor for injury, including concussion, in youth ice hockey. Recent evidence regarding injury rates in youth leagues prompted USA Hockey to institute a national policy change in 2011 that increased the age of body checking introduction from 11-12 years old (Pee Wee) to 13-14 years old (Bantam). Body checking policy was more controversial in Canada, and research evidence alone was insufficient to drive change. The purpose of this paper is to provide an example of one of the knowledge exchange processes that occurred between researchers and community stakeholders, leading up to a national policy change in 2013.
There were 28 stakeholder attendees, representing the research community, youth hockey organizations, and child health advocacy groups.
A one-day meeting held in Whistler, British Columbia, in April 2013.
Researchers and stakeholders presented current perspectives on evidence and policy change, and discussion focused on an a priori set of questions designed to elicit facilitators and barriers to policy change.
Three major factors that can drive policy change in the sport safety context were identified: the need for decision-making leadership, the importance of knowledge translation, and the role of sport culture as a barrier to change.
There is a critical need for researcher and stakeholder partnership in facilitating ongoing policy discussion and informing evidence-based policy change in sport and recreation injury prevention.
在青少年冰球运动中,身体冲撞是包括脑震荡在内的受伤的一个重要风险因素。近期有关青少年联赛受伤率的证据促使美国曲棍球协会在2011年进行了一项全国性政策变革,将允许身体冲撞的年龄从11至12岁(儿童组)提高到了13至14岁(少年组)。在加拿大,身体冲撞政策更具争议性,仅靠研究证据不足以推动变革。本文的目的是提供一个知识交流过程的例子,该过程发生在研究人员与社区利益相关者之间,最终促成了2013年的一项全国性政策变革。
有28名利益相关者出席,代表了研究界、青少年曲棍球组织和儿童健康倡导团体。
2013年4月在不列颠哥伦比亚省惠斯勒举行了为期一天的会议。
研究人员和利益相关者就证据和政策变革发表了当前观点,讨论集中在一组预先设定的问题上,这些问题旨在找出政策变革的促进因素和障碍。
确定了在运动安全背景下可推动政策变革的三个主要因素:决策领导力的必要性、知识转化的重要性以及运动文化作为变革障碍的作用。
研究人员与利益相关者建立伙伴关系对于促进持续的政策讨论以及为运动和娱乐伤害预防方面基于证据的政策变革提供信息至关重要。