• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在非精英 13 至 14 岁冰球联盟中禁止身体检查是否会降低受伤和脑震荡的发生率?在加拿大两个省的队列研究。

Does disallowing body checking in non-elite 13- to 14-year-old ice hockey leagues reduce rates of injury and concussion? A cohort study in two Canadian provinces.

机构信息

Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2020 Apr;54(7):414-420. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101092. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2019-101092
PMID:31492676
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of injury and concussion among non-elite (lowest 60% by division of play) Bantam (ages 13-14 years) ice hockey leagues that disallow body checking to non-elite Bantam leagues that allow body checking.

METHODS

In this 2-year cohort study, Bantam non-elite ice hockey players were recruited from leagues where policy allowed body checking in games (Calgary/Edmonton 2014-2015, Edmonton 2015-2016) and where policy disallowed body checking (Kelowna/Vancouver 2014-2015, Calgary 2015-2016). All ice hockey game-related injuries resulting in medical attention, inability to complete a session and/or time loss from hockey were identified using valid injury surveillance methodology. Any player suspected of having concussion was referred to a study physician for diagnosis and management.

RESULTS

49 body checking (608 players) and 33 non-body checking teams (396 players) participated. There were 129 injuries (incidence rate (IR)=7.98/1000 hours) and 54 concussions (IR=3.34/1000 hours) in the body checking teams in games. After policy change, there were 31 injuries (IR=3.66/1000 hours) and 17 concussions (IR=2.01/1000 hours) in games. Policy disallowing body checking was associated with a lower rate of all injury (adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.44; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.74). The point estimate showed a lower rate of concussion (adjusted IRR=0.6; 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.18), but this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Policy change disallowing body checking in non-elite Bantam ice hockey resulted in a 56% lower rate of injury. There is growing evidence that disallowing body checking in youth ice hockey is associated with fewer injuries.

摘要

目的

比较禁止身体接触的非精英(按分区划分最低 60%)少年冰球联赛(13-14 岁)和允许身体接触的非精英少年冰球联赛之间的受伤和脑震荡发生率。

方法

在这项为期 2 年的队列研究中,从允许在比赛中进行身体接触的政策的少年非精英冰球联赛(2014-2015 年卡尔加里/埃德蒙顿,2015-2016 年埃德蒙顿)和不允许进行身体接触的政策的少年非精英冰球联赛(2014-2015 年基洛纳/温哥华,2015-2016 年卡尔加里)招募少年非精英冰球运动员。使用有效的伤害监测方法确定所有导致医疗关注、无法完成比赛和/或无法参加冰球比赛的与冰球比赛相关的伤害。任何疑似脑震荡的运动员都将被转介给研究医生进行诊断和管理。

结果

有 49 个允许身体接触的队伍(608 名运动员)和 33 个不允许身体接触的队伍(396 名运动员)参与了研究。在身体接触组的比赛中,有 129 例受伤(发生率(IR)=7.98/1000 小时)和 54 例脑震荡(IR=3.34/1000 小时)。在政策改变后,在比赛中,有 31 例受伤(IR=3.66/1000 小时)和 17 例脑震荡(IR=2.01/1000 小时)。禁止身体接触的政策与所有伤害发生率降低有关(调整后的发病率比(IRR)=0.44;95%置信区间:0.27 至 0.74)。虽然点估计显示脑震荡发生率较低(调整后的 IRR=0.6;95%置信区间:0.31 至 1.18),但没有统计学意义。

结论

禁止非精英少年冰球中的身体接触的政策变化导致受伤率降低了 56%。越来越多的证据表明,禁止青少年冰球中的身体接触与减少伤害有关。

相似文献

1
Does disallowing body checking in non-elite 13- to 14-year-old ice hockey leagues reduce rates of injury and concussion? A cohort study in two Canadian provinces.在非精英 13 至 14 岁冰球联盟中禁止身体检查是否会降低受伤和脑震荡的发生率?在加拿大两个省的队列研究。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Apr;54(7):414-420. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101092. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
2
Body checking in non-elite adolescent ice hockey leagues: it is never too late for policy change aiming to protect the health of adolescents.非精英青少年冰球联盟中的身体碰撞:为保护青少年健康而改变政策永远不会太晚。
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Jan;56(1):12-17. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103757. Epub 2021 May 20.
3
Reality Check 2: The Cost-Effectiveness of Policy Disallowing Body Checking in Non-Elite 13- to 14-Year-Old Ice Hockey Players.现实校验 2:禁止非精英 13-14 岁冰球运动员身体冲撞的政策的成本效益。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 11;18(12):6322. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126322.
4
Policy change eliminating body checking in non-elite ice hockey leads to a threefold reduction in injury and concussion risk in 11- and 12-year-old players.政策改变取消非精英冰球中的身体冲撞,导致 11 至 12 岁球员的受伤和脑震荡风险降低三倍。
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jan;50(1):55-61. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095103.
5
The Effect of the "Zero Tolerance for Head Contact" Rule Change on the Risk of Concussions in Youth Ice Hockey Players.“头部接触零容忍”规则变更对青少年冰球运动员脑震荡风险的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):468-473. doi: 10.1177/0363546516669701. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
6
The risk of injury associated with body checking among Pee Wee ice hockey players: an evaluation of Hockey Canada's national body checking policy change.青少年冰球运动员身体冲撞相关受伤风险:对加拿大曲棍球协会国家身体冲撞政策变化的评估。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;51(24):1767-1772. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097392. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
7
Factors Associated With Concussion Rates in Youth Ice Hockey Players: Data From the Largest Longitudinal Cohort Study in Canadian Youth Ice Hockey.与青少年冰球运动员脑震荡发生率相关的因素:来自加拿大最大的青少年冰球纵向队列研究的数据。
Clin J Sport Med. 2023 Sep 1;33(5):497-504. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000001177. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
8
Safe2Play in youth ice hockey: injury profile and risk factors in a 5-year Canadian longitudinal cohort study.青少年冰球的安全:5 年加拿大纵向队列研究中的损伤概况和危险因素。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2385024. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2385024. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
9
Risk of injury associated with body checking among youth ice hockey players.青少年冰球运动员身体碰撞相关的受伤风险。
JAMA. 2010 Jun 9;303(22):2265-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.755.
10
An Economic Evaluation of Disallowing Body Checking in 11- to 12-Year-Old Ice Hockey Leagues.不允许 11 至 12 岁年龄段冰球联赛中身体冲撞的经济学评价。
Sports Health. 2022 Mar-Apr;14(2):292-298. doi: 10.1177/19417381211021551. Epub 2021 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Delaying Tackling in Youth Contact Sports: Moving toward a Safer Future or Softening the Game?青少年对抗性运动中延迟拦截:是迈向更安全的未来还是削弱比赛强度?
Sports Med. 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02236-z.
2
The Incidence of Sports-Related Concussion in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童和青少年与运动相关的脑震荡发生率:系统评价与荟萃分析
Sports Med Open. 2025 Apr 11;11(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00834-9.
3
Symptom Recovery in Children Aged 5 to 12 Years With Sport-Related and Non-Sport-Related Concussion.
5至12岁与运动相关和非运动相关脑震荡儿童的症状恢复情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2448797. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48797.
4
Physical Characteristics of Swedish Female Professional Ice Hockey Players Allowed Body Checking.允许身体冲撞的瑞典女子职业冰球运动员的身体特征
J Strength Cond Res. 2025 Mar 1;39(3):e463-e468. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005009. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
5
Safe2Play in youth ice hockey: injury profile and risk factors in a 5-year Canadian longitudinal cohort study.青少年冰球的安全:5 年加拿大纵向队列研究中的损伤概况和危险因素。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2385024. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2385024. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
6
Headgear use in girls' lacrosse-stakeholders not ready for change.女子长曲棍球中头盔的使用——利益相关者尚未准备好做出改变。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Jun 4;6:1363007. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1363007. eCollection 2024.
7
What is the Injury Incidence and Profile in Professional Male Ice Hockey? A Systematic Review.职业男子冰球运动中的损伤发生率及概况如何?一项系统综述。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):1398-1409. doi: 10.26603/001c.90591. eCollection 2024.
8
Sport-related concussion and bodychecking in children and youth: Evaluation, management, and policy implications.儿童和青少年与运动相关的脑震荡及身体检查:评估、管理及政策影响
Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Jun 6;28(4):252-266. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxad007. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
Protective equipment in youth ice hockey: are mouthguards and helmet age relevant to concussion risk?青少年冰球的防护设备:护齿器和头盔的年龄与脑震荡风险有关吗?
Br J Sports Med. 2023 May;57(10):571-577. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105585. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
10
Sport-related concussion research agenda beyond medical science: culture, ethics, science, policy.医学之外的与运动相关的脑震荡研究议程:文化、伦理、科学、政策。
J Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 23;51(1):68-76. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108812.