• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2001年至2014年日本肿瘤药物审批的监管审查时间。对变化、影响审查时间的因素以及与美国差异的考量。

Regulatory review time for approval of oncology drugs in Japan between 2001 and 2014. Considerations of changes, factors that affect review time, and difference with the United States.

作者信息

Maeda Hideki, Kurokawa Tatsuo

机构信息

Division of Drug Development and Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Keio University, 1-5-30, Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan; Oncology, Clinical Development Department, Global Development, Astellas Pharma Inc., 2-5-1, Nihonbashi-Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 May;55(5):481-9. doi: 10.1002/jcph.458. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1002/jcph.458
PMID:25560978
Abstract

In this study, we comprehensively and historically studied the review time of oncology drugs approved by the regulatory authorities in Japan with publicly available information. A total of 120 applications of oncology drugs were approved in Japan between April 2001 and July 2014. The review time peaked with 732.0 days (24.4 months) in 2005, and showed a tendency to decline gradually each year thereafter. After 2012, a significant reduction of the review time was seen in comparison to the median of 13-year median time. In addition, we compared the review time with that in the United States. The median review time lag with the United States was significantly peaked in 2005. After 2005, the review time lag with the FDA has decreased, but lag did not significantly reduce by 2014. We also examined factors influencing the review time in Japan with multiple regression analysis. It was found that the factors related to a use of overseas data and expedited program for accelerating the reviews influenced the direction of shortening the review time. We consider that regulatory authorities in Japan need to keep making efforts to reduce the review time further and eliminate the review time lag with the United States.

摘要

在本研究中,我们利用公开可得信息,全面且历史性地研究了日本监管机构批准的肿瘤药物的审评时间。2001年4月至2014年7月期间,日本共批准了120项肿瘤药物申请。审评时间在2005年达到峰值,为732.0天(24.4个月),此后逐年呈逐渐下降趋势。2012年之后,与13年中位时间的中位数相比,审评时间显著缩短。此外,我们还将审评时间与美国的进行了比较。与美国的中位审评时间差距在2005年显著达到峰值。2005年之后,与美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的审评时间差距有所减小,但到2014年差距仍未显著缩小。我们还通过多元回归分析研究了影响日本审评时间的因素。结果发现,与使用海外数据及加速审评的快速程序相关的因素影响了审评时间缩短的方向。我们认为,日本监管机构需要继续努力进一步缩短审评时间,并消除与美国的审评时间差距。

相似文献

1
Regulatory review time for approval of oncology drugs in Japan between 2001 and 2014. Considerations of changes, factors that affect review time, and difference with the United States.2001年至2014年日本肿瘤药物审批的监管审查时间。对变化、影响审查时间的因素以及与美国差异的考量。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 May;55(5):481-9. doi: 10.1002/jcph.458. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
2
Recent trends for drug lag in clinical development of oncology drugs in Japan: does the oncology drug lag still exist in Japan?日本肿瘤药物临床开发中药物滞后的近期趋势:日本是否仍存在肿瘤药物滞后现象?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec;20(6):1072-80. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0825-4. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
3
The notorious "drug lag" for oncology drugs in Japan.日本抗肿瘤药物臭名昭著的“药物滞后”现象。
Invest New Drugs. 2011 Aug;29(4):706-12. doi: 10.1007/s10637-011-9638-0. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
4
Anticancer drug development from traditional cytotoxic to targeted therapies: evidence of shorter drug research and development time, and shorter drug lag in Japan.从传统细胞毒性药物到靶向治疗的抗癌药物开发:日本的药物研发时间更短,药物滞后时间更短的证据。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Oct;37(5):547-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01332.x. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
5
The drug lag and associated factors for orphan anticancer drugs in Japan compared to the United States.日本与美国的孤儿抗癌药物的药物研发滞后及其相关因素比较。
Invest New Drugs. 2019 Oct;37(5):1086-1093. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0612-y. Epub 2018 May 31.
6
Evolving Landscape of New Drug Approval in Japan and Lags from International Birth Dates: Retrospective Regulatory Analysis.日本新药审批格局的演变及其与国际上市日期的差距:回顾性监管分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 May;109(5):1265-1273. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2080. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
7
Trends in oncology drug lags in Japan from 2001 to 2020: A cross-sectional study.2001 年至 2020 年日本肿瘤药物研发滞后趋势:一项横断面研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Dec;16(12):2665-2674. doi: 10.1111/cts.13660. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
8
Approval of new drugs 1999-2007: comparison of the US, the EU and Japan situations.1999-2007 年新药审批:美国、欧盟和日本情况比较。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010 Jun;35(3):289-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01099.x.
9
Reforms of regulatory pathways for approval of new antineoplastic drugs in Japan from 2004 to 2019 and accompanying changes in pivotal clinical trial designs.2004 年至 2019 年日本新型抗肿瘤药物审批监管途径的改革及伴随的关键性临床试验设计的变化。
Invest New Drugs. 2022 Feb;40(1):142-150. doi: 10.1007/s10637-021-01165-8. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
10
Development times, clinical testing, postmarket follow-up, and safety risks for the new drugs approved by the US food and drug administration: the class of 2008.2008 年批准的新药的研发时间、临床测试、上市后随访和安全风险:美国食品和药物管理局的分类。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan;174(1):90-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11813.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in oncology drug lags in Japan from 2001 to 2020: A cross-sectional study.2001 年至 2020 年日本肿瘤药物研发滞后趋势:一项横断面研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Dec;16(12):2665-2674. doi: 10.1111/cts.13660. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
2
Assessment of Surrogate End Point Trends in Clinical Trials to Approve Oncology Drugs From 2001 to 2020 in Japan.评估 2001 年至 2020 年日本临床试验中肿瘤药物替代终点趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238875. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8875.
3
How are new drugs disseminated in Japan? Analysis using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims of Japan.
新药在日本是如何传播的?利用日本国民健康保险索赔数据库进行分析。
Cancer Sci. 2022 May;113(5):1771-1778. doi: 10.1111/cas.15322. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
4
Assessment of Drugs Approved by Public Knowledge-Based Applications (Kouchi-shinsei) During the Last Two Decades in Japan.评估过去二十年在日本由公共知识型应用程序(Kouchi-shinsei)批准的药物。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Oct;110(4):1127-1135. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2332. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
5
Toward Optimum Benefit-Risk and Reduced Access Lag For Cancer Drugs in Asia: A Global Development Framework Guided by Clinical Pharmacology Principles.迈向亚洲癌症药物的最佳效益风险与缩短准入滞后:以临床药理学原则为导向的全球发展框架
Clin Transl Sci. 2016 Feb;9(1):9-22. doi: 10.1111/cts.12386. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
6
A perspective on the benefit-risk assessment for new and emerging pharmaceuticals in Japan.日本新型及新兴药物的获益-风险评估视角
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Mar 31;9:1877-88. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S62636. eCollection 2015.
7
Recent trends for drug lag in clinical development of oncology drugs in Japan: does the oncology drug lag still exist in Japan?日本肿瘤药物临床开发中药物滞后的近期趋势:日本是否仍存在肿瘤药物滞后现象?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec;20(6):1072-80. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0825-4. Epub 2015 Apr 3.