• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本新药审批格局的演变及其与国际上市日期的差距:回顾性监管分析。

Evolving Landscape of New Drug Approval in Japan and Lags from International Birth Dates: Retrospective Regulatory Analysis.

机构信息

Office of New Drug 1, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.

Office of New Drug 2, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 May;109(5):1265-1273. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2080. Epub 2020 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1002/cpt.2080
PMID:33048367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8246743/
Abstract

The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) has approved hundreds of new drugs in recent years. We retrospectively analyzed the new drugs approved in Japan from 2008 to 2019, and identify the first-in-world approvals and clarify the current drug lag. The new drug and the drug lag were defined as a drug with a new active substance and a difference between the approval date in Japan and the international birth date, respectively. Among 400 new drugs approved in Japan during the last 12 years, 80 (20.0%) were first approved in Japan, and 320 were outside Japan (the United States: 202, 50.5%; Europe: 82, 20.5%; other regions: 36, 9.0%). Of these, 45 new drugs have not yet been approved outside Japan, and the remaining 355 have been globally approved in Japan and overseas. The number of new drug approvals were the largest in oncology followed by metabolic/endocrine and infectious diseases. The median drug lags (year) among all 400 new drugs and 355 new drugs with global approvals were 4.3 and 4.7 in the first tertile (2008-2011), 1.5 and 2.6 in the second tertile (2012-2015), and reduced to 1.3 and 2.2 in the third tertile (2016-2019), respectively. Substantial drug lag remains in neurology, psychiatry, and therapeutic areas where the number of new drug approvals was relatively small. Collectively, one-fifth of the new drugs approved in Japan are first-in-world approvals. Drug lag has been greatly decreased, although it still exists.

摘要

药品和医疗器械管理局(PMDA)近年来批准了数百种新药。我们回顾性分析了 2008 年至 2019 年在日本批准的新药,并确定了全球首次批准的新药,并阐明了目前的药物滞后情况。新药和药物滞后分别定义为具有新活性物质的药物以及日本批准日期与国际出生日期之间的差异。在过去 12 年中,日本批准的 400 种新药中,有 80 种(20.0%)为日本首次批准,320 种为日本以外地区(美国:202,50.5%;欧洲:82,20.5%;其他地区:36,9.0%)。其中,45 种新药尚未在日本以外地区获得批准,其余 355 种新药在日本和海外已获得全球批准。在所有 400 种新药和 355 种具有全球批准的新药中,批准新药数量最多的是肿瘤学,其次是代谢/内分泌和传染病学。在所有 400 种新药和 355 种具有全球批准的新药中,药物滞后中位数(年)在第一三分位数(2008-2011 年)为 4.3 年和 4.7 年,在第二三分位数(2012-2015 年)为 1.5 年和 2.6 年,在第三三分位数(2016-2019 年)分别减少到 1.3 年和 2.2 年。神经病学、精神病学和新药批准数量相对较少的治疗领域仍然存在大量的药物滞后。总体而言,日本批准的新药中有五分之一是全球首次批准的新药。虽然仍然存在药物滞后,但已经大大减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/8246743/4294a01a24b6/CPT-109-1265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/8246743/096f89ff855b/CPT-109-1265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/8246743/34377a76664c/CPT-109-1265-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/8246743/91f6259ba2bd/CPT-109-1265-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/8246743/a6d4cd59ada7/CPT-109-1265-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/8246743/4294a01a24b6/CPT-109-1265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/8246743/096f89ff855b/CPT-109-1265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/8246743/34377a76664c/CPT-109-1265-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/8246743/91f6259ba2bd/CPT-109-1265-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/8246743/a6d4cd59ada7/CPT-109-1265-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/8246743/4294a01a24b6/CPT-109-1265-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolving Landscape of New Drug Approval in Japan and Lags from International Birth Dates: Retrospective Regulatory Analysis.日本新药审批格局的演变及其与国际上市日期的差距:回顾性监管分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 May;109(5):1265-1273. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2080. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
2
Approval of new drugs 1999-2007: comparison of the US, the EU and Japan situations.1999-2007 年新药审批:美国、欧盟和日本情况比较。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010 Jun;35(3):289-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01099.x.
3
Rationales of delay and difference in regulatory review by Japan, the USA and Europe among new drugs first approved in Japan.日本、美国和欧洲对日本首次批准的新药在监管审查中延迟和差异的理由。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Aug;87(8):3279-3291. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14749. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
The notorious "drug lag" for oncology drugs in Japan.日本抗肿瘤药物臭名昭著的“药物滞后”现象。
Invest New Drugs. 2011 Aug;29(4):706-12. doi: 10.1007/s10637-011-9638-0. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
5
Recent trends and success factors in reducing the lag time to approval of new drugs in Japan.日本缩短新药审批时间的最新趋势和成功因素。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 May;95(5):467-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.256.
6
Continued cancer drug approvals in Japan and Europe after market withdrawal in the United States: A comparative study of accelerated approvals.美国市场撤市后日本和欧洲继续批准抗癌药物:加速批准的比较研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jul;17(7):e13879. doi: 10.1111/cts.13879.
7
Recent trends for drug lag in clinical development of oncology drugs in Japan: does the oncology drug lag still exist in Japan?日本肿瘤药物临床开发中药物滞后的近期趋势:日本是否仍存在肿瘤药物滞后现象?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec;20(6):1072-80. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0825-4. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
8
A Qualitative Study on the Differences Between Trial Populations and the Approved Therapeutic Indications of Antineoplastic Agents by 3 Regulatory Agencies From 2010 to 2018.一项关于 2010 年至 2018 年间 3 个监管机构的抗肿瘤药物试验人群与批准治疗适应证之间差异的定性研究。
Clin Ther. 2020 Feb;42(2):305-320.e0. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
Regulatory review time for approval of oncology drugs in Japan between 2001 and 2014. Considerations of changes, factors that affect review time, and difference with the United States.2001年至2014年日本肿瘤药物审批的监管审查时间。对变化、影响审查时间的因素以及与美国差异的考量。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 May;55(5):481-9. doi: 10.1002/jcph.458. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
10
Notable Differences in Drug Lag Between Korea and Japan of New Drugs Between 2009 and 2017.2009 年至 2017 年新药在韩国和日本的上市时间差距显著。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Mar;54(2):418-423. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00071-9. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Conducted in Asia, Focusing on Japan's Participation and Small/Medium Companies-Sponsored Trials.在亚洲开展的多区域临床试验的特点,重点关注日本的参与情况以及中小型公司赞助的试验。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00837-4.
2
New Horizon in Clinical Development Strategy in Japan Based on New Guideline on Japanese Phase 1 Studies Prior to Multi-Regional Clinical Trials.基于日本多区域临床试验前I期研究新指南的日本临床开发策略新视野。
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 May;18(5):e70257. doi: 10.1111/cts.70257.
3
Evaluation of drug lag and drug loss in Japan: participation in global phase III oncology trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Are Regulators Talking to Each Other Across Borders?监管机构正在跨境相互沟通吗?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Mar;107(3):481-483. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1761.
2
To what degree are review outcomes aligned for new active substances (NASs) between the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration? A comparison based on publicly available information for NASs initially approved in the time period 2014 to 2016.欧洲药品管理局和美国食品药品监督管理局对新活性物质(NASs)的审评结果一致性如何?基于2014年至2016年期间首次获批的NASs公开信息进行的比较。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e028677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028677.
3
日本药物滞后与药物损失评估:参与全球III期肿瘤学试验
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02756-8.
4
Cost and Duration of Clinical Trials in Drug Development by Japanese Pharmaceutical Companies.日本制药公司药物研发临床试验的成本与持续时间。
Pharmaceut Med. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s40290-025-00558-x.
5
New Drug Approvals in China: An International Comparative Analysis, 2019-2023.《中国新药获批情况:2019 - 2023年国际比较分析》
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Apr 3;19:2629-2639. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S514132. eCollection 2025.
6
Repurposing of nervous system drugs for cancer treatment: recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives.用于癌症治疗的神经系统药物的重新利用:最新进展、挑战及未来展望。
Discov Oncol. 2025 Mar 26;16(1):396. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02067-4.
7
Regulatory efforts to address the access gap for foreign new drugs in China: the priority review program and related policies.解决国外新药在中国可及性差距的监管举措:优先审评计划及相关政策。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2025 Feb 25;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00396-5.
8
PMDA initiatives to enhance drug development via multi-regional clinical trials.日本药品和医疗器械管理局通过多区域临床试验加强药物研发的举措。
Transl Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;32(4):173-176. doi: 10.12793/tcp.2024.32.e16. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
9
Application of model-informed drug development (MIDD) for dose selection in regulatory submissions for drug approval in Japan.模型引导药物研发(MIDD)在日本药品批准监管申报剂量选择中的应用。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2025 Jan 6;52(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s10928-024-09954-3.
10
Concordance Between Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Review and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Decision Among New Drug Applications in Japan.日本药品和医疗器械局审评与厚生劳动省在新药申请审批方面的一致性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Feb;117(2):544-553. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3485. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
Food and Drug Administration vs European Medicines Agency: Review times and clinical evidence on novel drugs at the time of approval.
美国食品药品监督管理局与欧洲药品管理局对比:新药获批时的审评时间及临床证据
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jan;86(1):170-174. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14130. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
Are the European Medicines Agency, US Food and Drug Administration, and Other International Regulators Talking to Each Other?欧洲药品管理局、美国食品和药物管理局及其他国际监管机构是否在相互沟通?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Mar;107(3):507-513. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1617. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
5
Evolving Vision of Regulatory Science in the Global Medical Community.全球医学共同体中监管科学的发展愿景。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jan;107(1):136-139. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1604. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
6
'Engagement' of patients and healthcare professionals in regulatory pharmacovigilance: establishing a conceptual and methodological framework.“参与”患者和医疗保健专业人员的监管药物警戒:建立概念和方法框架。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;75(9):1181-1192. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02705-1. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
7
Drug Lag for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatments in the East and West.东西方炎症性肠病治疗的药物滞后问题。
Inflamm Intest Dis. 2018 Nov;3(1):25-31. doi: 10.1159/000491878. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
Influence of Drug Lag on New Drug Label Revisions.药物延迟对新药标签修订的影响。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Jan;53(1):138-145. doi: 10.1177/2168479018769294. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
9
What to Know About Medicines With New Active Ingredients Approved in FY 2016 / 2016 in Japan and EU: A Brief Comparison of New Medicines Approved in Japan and the EU in 2016.2016财年在日本和欧盟获批的含新活性成分药物须知:2016年日本和欧盟获批新药简要比较
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Mar;52(2):214-219. doi: 10.1177/2168479017720248. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
10
Enhancing the incorporation of the patient's voice in drug development and evaluation.加强患者声音在药物研发和评估中的融入。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Apr 2;4:10. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0093-3. eCollection 2018.