Rodríguez Jon Paul, Keith David A, Rodríguez-Clark Kathryn M, Murray Nicholas J, Nicholson Emily, Regan Tracey J, Miller Rebecca M, Barrow Edmund G, Bland Lucie M, Boe Kaia, Brooks Thomas M, Oliveira-Miranda María A, Spalding Mark, Wit Piet
Centro de Ecología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Apdo. 20632, Caracas 1020-A, Venezuela Provita, Apdo. 47552, Caracas 1041-A, Venezuela IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland IUCN Species Survival Commission, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland
IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland IUCN Species Survival Commission, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland Centre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage, Hurstville, New South Wales, Australia.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 19;370(1662):20140003. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0003.
The newly developed IUCN Red List of Ecosystems is part of a growing toolbox for assessing risks to biodiversity, which addresses ecosystems and their functioning. The Red List of Ecosystems standard allows systematic assessment of all freshwater, marine, terrestrial and subterranean ecosystem types in terms of their global risk of collapse. In addition, the Red List of Ecosystems categories and criteria provide a technical base for assessments of ecosystem status at the regional, national, or subnational level. While the Red List of Ecosystems criteria were designed to be widely applicable by scientists and practitioners, guidelines are needed to ensure they are implemented in a standardized manner to reduce epistemic uncertainties and allow robust comparisons among ecosystems and over time. We review the intended application of the Red List of Ecosystems assessment process, summarize 'best-practice' methods for ecosystem assessments and outline approaches to ensure operational rigour of assessments. The Red List of Ecosystems will inform priority setting for ecosystem types worldwide, and strengthen capacity to report on progress towards the Aichi Targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity. When integrated with other IUCN knowledge products, such as the World Database of Protected Areas/Protected Planet, Key Biodiversity Areas and the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, the Red List of Ecosystems will contribute to providing the most complete global measure of the status of biodiversity yet achieved.
新制定的世界自然保护联盟生态系统红色名录是评估生物多样性风险的不断增长的工具集的一部分,该工具集涉及生态系统及其功能。生态系统红色名录标准允许根据全球崩溃风险对所有淡水、海洋、陆地和地下生态系统类型进行系统评估。此外,生态系统红色名录的类别和标准为区域、国家或次国家层面的生态系统状况评估提供了技术基础。虽然生态系统红色名录标准旨在供科学家和从业人员广泛应用,但需要指南以确保其以标准化方式实施,以减少认知不确定性,并允许在不同生态系统之间以及随时间进行可靠比较。我们审查了生态系统红色名录评估过程的预期应用,总结了生态系统评估的“最佳实践”方法,并概述了确保评估操作严谨性的方法。生态系统红色名录将为全球生态系统类型的优先排序提供信息,并加强报告《生物多样性公约》爱知目标进展情况的能力。当与世界自然保护联盟的其他知识产品(如世界保护区数据库/保护地球、关键生物多样性地区和世界自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录)相结合时,生态系统红色名录将有助于提供迄今为止对生物多样性状况最全面的全球衡量。