Uliaszek Amanda A, Al-Dajani Nadia, Bagby R Michael
University of Toronto Scarborough.
J Pers Disord. 2015 Dec;29(6):719-34. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2014_28_170. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
Shifts in the conceptualization of psychopathology have favored a dimensional approach, with the five-factor model (FFM) playing a prominent role in this research. However, reservations about the utility of the FFM in differentiating disorders have risen. In the current investigation, a "bottom-up" analytical method was used to ascertain the hierarchical structure of personality, with investigation of the specificity of the traits in categorizing diagnostic categories across an expanded array of psychiatric disorders. Following earlier investigations, which used a hierarchical structural approach, this study presents new results relating to the differentiation of several forms of psychopathology not included in these earlier analyses--bipolar disorder, psychotic disorders, problem gambling, posttraumatic stress disorder, and somatoform disorders--across distinct levels of a personality hierarchy based on the FFM. These results bolster the argument for the use of FFM personality traits in characterizing and differentiating psychiatric diagnostic groups.
精神病理学概念的转变倾向于采用维度方法,其中五因素模型(FFM)在这项研究中发挥了重要作用。然而,对于FFM在区分不同障碍方面的效用的疑虑也在增加。在当前的调查中,采用了一种“自下而上”的分析方法来确定人格的层次结构,并研究了在一系列广泛的精神障碍中,特质在诊断类别分类中的特异性。继早期采用层次结构方法的研究之后,本研究呈现了与几种早期分析未涵盖的精神病理学形式——双相情感障碍、精神障碍、问题赌博、创伤后应激障碍和躯体形式障碍——在基于FFM的人格层次结构不同水平上的区分相关的新结果。这些结果支持了在描述和区分精神科诊断组时使用FFM人格特质的观点。