Lau Chloe, Bagby R Michael, Pollock Bruce G, Quilty Lena
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, Schulich Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
J Intell. 2023 Apr 8;11(4):71. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040071.
Although numerous studies have explored latent profiles using the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of normative personality, no studies have investigated how broad personality traits (i.e., FFM) and pathological personality traits using the alternative model of personality disorder (AMPD) may combine for latent personality profiles. The present study recruited outpatients (N = 201) who completed the Big Five Aspects Scales (BFAS), Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I/P), gambling and alcohol use measures, and the Weschler Intelligence subtests. When FFM and AMPD measures were combined, latent profile analyses revealed four profiles, Internalizing-Thought disorder, Externalizing, Average-Detached, and Adaptive. Detachment and openness to experience were the most and least essential traits for profile distinction, respectively. No associations between group membership and cognitive ability measures were found. Internalizing-Thought disorder membership was linked with a current mood and anxiety disorder diagnosis. Externalizing profile membership was associated with younger age, problematic gambling, alcohol use, and a current substance use disorder diagnosis. The four FFM-AMPD profiles overlapped with the four FFM-only and three AMPD-only profiles. Overall, the FFM-AMPD profiles appeared to have better convergent and discriminant validity with DSM-relevant psychopathology.
尽管众多研究已使用规范性人格的五因素模型(FFM)探究潜在类型,但尚无研究调查广泛的人格特质(即FFM)与使用人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的病理性人格特质如何结合形成潜在人格类型。本研究招募了门诊患者(N = 201),他们完成了大五人格量表(BFAS)、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表(PID-5)、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第4版结构化临床访谈(SCID-I/P)、赌博和酒精使用测量,以及韦氏智力量表子测验。当FFM和AMPD测量相结合时,潜在类型分析揭示了四种类型:内化-思维障碍型、外化型、平均-超脱型和适应型。超脱和开放性体验分别是区分类型最关键和最不重要的特质。未发现组成员身份与认知能力测量之间存在关联。内化-思维障碍型组成员身份与当前的情绪和焦虑障碍诊断相关。外化型组成员身份与较年轻的年龄、问题性赌博、酒精使用以及当前的物质使用障碍诊断相关。这四种FFM-AMPD类型与仅基于FFM的四种类型和仅基于AMPD的三种类型重叠。总体而言,FFM-AMPD类型在与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》相关的精神病理学方面似乎具有更好的聚合效度和区分效度。