McEvoy Kevin, Hasenstab Kyle, Senturk Damla, Sanders Andrew, Jeste Shafali S
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Center for Autism Research and Treatment, University of California Los Angeles, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 68-237, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Brain Imaging Behav. 2015 Mar;9(1):104-14. doi: 10.1007/s11682-014-9343-7.
We quantified the potential effects of physiologic artifact on the estimation of EEG band power in a cohort of typically developing children in order to guide artifact rejection methods in quantitative EEG data analysis in developmental populations. High density EEG was recorded for 2 min while children, ages 2-6, watched a video of bubbles. Segments of data were categorized as blinks, saccades, EMG or artifact-free, and both absolute and relative power in the theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (13-30 Hz) and gamma (35-45 Hz) bands were calculated in 9 regions for each category. Using a linear mixed model approach with artifact type, region and their interaction as predictors, we compared mean band power between clean data and each type of artifact. We found significant differences in mean relative and absolute power between artifacts and artifact-free segments in all frequency bands. The magnitude and direction of the differences varied based on power type, region, and frequency band. The most significant differences in mean band power were found in the gamma band for EMG artifact and the theta band for ocular artifacts. Artifact detection strategies need to be sensitive to the oscillations of interest for a given analysis, with the most conservative approach being the removal of all EMG and ocular artifact from EEG data. Quantitative EEG holds considerable promise as a clinical biomarker of both typical and atypical development. However, there needs to be transparency in the choice of power type, regions of interest, and frequency band, as each of these variables are differentially vulnerable to noise, and therefore, their interpretation depends on the methods used to identify and remove artifacts.
我们对一组发育正常儿童的脑电图频段功率估计中生理伪迹的潜在影响进行了量化,以指导发育人群定量脑电图数据分析中的伪迹去除方法。在2至6岁儿童观看气泡视频时,记录了2分钟的高密度脑电图。数据段被分类为眨眼、扫视、肌电图或无伪迹,并且针对每个类别在9个区域中计算了θ(4 - 7Hz)、α(8 - 12Hz)、β(13 - 30Hz)和γ(35 - 45Hz)频段的绝对功率和相对功率。使用线性混合模型方法,将伪迹类型、区域及其相互作用作为预测因子,我们比较了干净数据与每种伪迹类型之间的平均频段功率。我们发现在所有频段中,伪迹与无伪迹段之间的平均相对功率和绝对功率存在显著差异。差异的大小和方向因功率类型、区域和频段而异。在肌电图伪迹的γ频段和眼部伪迹的θ频段中发现了平均频段功率的最显著差异。伪迹检测策略需要对给定分析中感兴趣的振荡敏感,最保守的方法是从脑电图数据中去除所有肌电图和眼部伪迹。定量脑电图作为典型和非典型发育的临床生物标志物具有很大的前景。然而,在功率类型、感兴趣区域和频段的选择上需要保持透明,因为这些变量中的每一个对噪声的敏感度不同,因此,它们的解释取决于用于识别和去除伪迹的方法。