• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双眼和单眼视野变化率的比较。

Comparison of rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.

作者信息

Chun Yeoun Sook, Shin Jae-Ho, Park In Ki

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jan 6;56(1):451-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15577.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.14-15577
PMID:25564449
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.

METHODS

The study included 1264 visual fields from 62 normal-tension glaucoma patients with a minimum of nine pairs of visual fields for at least 5 years of follow-up. Integrated binocular visual fields (BVFs) were calculated from the two monocular visual fields using a binocular summation. Linear regression of mean deviation (MD) values was used to evaluate the rates of change of the BVFs and monocular visual fields. For each patient, the eye with the worse MD value at baseline was defined as the worse MD eye. The eye with the faster rate of change of monocular visual fields was defined as the faster-changing eye.

RESULTS

The mean age of subjects was 61.8 years at baseline, the mean number of paired visual field tests was 10.2, and the mean follow-up was 8.1 years. The mean rate of change in the BVFs (-0.10 dB/y) was significantly slower than that of the faster-changing eyes (-0.34 dB/y) and faster than that of the slower-changing eyes (-0.06 dB/y; P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Forty-five eyes (64.5%) among the worse MD eyes at baseline were identified as faster-changing eyes at last follow-up, and having a worse MD value at baseline was a risk factor for being the faster-changing eye (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of change in BVFs was intermediate between the rates of the faster-changing and slower-changing eyes.

摘要

目的

比较双眼和单眼视野的变化率。

方法

该研究纳入了62例正常眼压性青光眼患者的1264个视野,这些患者至少有9对视野,且随访时间至少为5年。使用双眼总和法从两个单眼视野计算出综合双眼视野(BVF)。采用平均偏差(MD)值的线性回归来评估BVF和单眼视野的变化率。对于每位患者,将基线时MD值较差的眼定义为MD较差眼。将单眼视野变化率较快的眼定义为变化较快眼。

结果

受试者的平均年龄在基线时为61.8岁,平均配对视野测试次数为10.2次,平均随访时间为8.1年。BVF的平均变化率(-0.10 dB/年)明显慢于变化较快眼的变化率(-0.34 dB/年),且快于变化较慢眼的变化率(-0.06 dB/年;两项比较P均<0.001)。在基线时MD较差的眼中,有45只眼(64.5%)在最后一次随访时被确定为变化较快眼,且基线时MD值较差是成为变化较快眼的一个危险因素(P = 0.025)。

结论

BVF的变化率介于变化较快眼和变化较慢眼的变化率之间。

相似文献

1
Comparison of rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.双眼和单眼视野变化率的比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jan 6;56(1):451-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15577.
2
Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices.患者有两只眼睛!:双眼与更好眼视野指数。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 1;52(9):7007-11. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7643.
3
Comparison of Impact of Monocular and Integrated Binocular Visual Fields on Vision-related Quality of Life.单眼与双眼融合视野对视力相关生活质量影响的比较
J Glaucoma. 2017 Mar;26(3):283-291. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000623.
4
The Relationship Between Binocular Visual Field Loss and Various Stages of Monocular Visual Field Damage in Glaucoma Patients.青光眼患者双眼视野损失与单眼视野损伤各阶段的关系。
J Glaucoma. 2019 Jan;28(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001102.
5
Five-year forecasts of the Visual Field Index (VFI) with binocular and monocular visual fields.双眼和单眼视野的视野指数(VFI)五年预测。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 May;251(5):1335-41. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2214-2. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
6
Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.利用 imo 视野计比较晚期青光眼患者单眼和双眼测试的中心视觉敏感度。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;104(11):1258-1534. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315251. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
7
Binocular Measures of Visual Acuity and Visual Field versus Binocular Approximations.视力和视野的双眼测量与双眼近似值
Ophthalmology. 2017 Jul;124(7):1031-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
[Comparison between binocular and monocular reading ability and its relation with central visual field sensitivity in glaucoma patients].[青光眼患者双眼与单眼阅读能力的比较及其与中心视野敏感度的关系]
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Nov;117(11):925-30.
9
Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results.从单眼视野结果预测双眼视野敏感度
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Jul;41(8):2212-21.
10
Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision.双眼视野与患者视力评估的相关性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Apr;43(4):1059-67.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.青光眼的功能评估:揭示进展。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov-Dec;65(6):639-661. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
2
Corneal hysteresis and glaucoma.角膜滞后与青光眼。
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;39(8):1909-1916. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-1011-2. Epub 2018 Sep 5.