Department of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov-Dec;65(6):639-661. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glaucomatous visual field progression and factors that are important for identifying progression. These include stimulus size, which area of the visual field to assess (central versus peripheral), and the testing frequency, evaluating which is important to detect change early while minimizing patient testing burden. We also review the different statistical methods developed to identify change. These include trend- and event-based analyses, parametric and nonparametric tests, population-based versus individualized approaches, as well as pointwise and global analyses. We hope this information will prove useful and important to enhance the management of glaucoma patients. Overall, analysis procedures based on series of at least 5 to 6 examinations that require confirmation and persistence of changes, that are guided by the pattern and shape of the glaucomatous visual field deficits, and that are consistent with structural defects provide the best clinical performance.
临床医生在管理青光眼患者时会仔细监测视野,以确定治疗是否有效或是否需要干预。视野检查可能反映疾病进展或检查之间的可变性。我们描述了评估青光眼视野进展的方法和视野检查,并介绍了确定进展的重要因素。这些因素包括刺激大小(视野的哪个区域进行评估,中央还是周边)和测试频率,评估哪个因素对于早期发现变化很重要,同时尽量减少患者的测试负担。我们还回顾了为识别变化而开发的不同统计方法。这些方法包括基于趋势和事件的分析、参数和非参数检验、基于人群和个体化的方法,以及点和全局分析。我们希望这些信息将有助于提高青光眼患者的管理水平。总体而言,基于至少 5 到 6 次检查的分析程序,这些程序需要确认和持续变化,并且需要根据青光眼视野缺损的模式和形状进行指导,同时与结构缺陷保持一致,提供了最佳的临床性能。