Marucco Arianna, Catalano Federico, Fenoglio Ivana, Turci Francesco, Martra Gianmario, Fubini Bice
Department of Chemistry, Interdepartmental Centre "G. Scansetti" for Studies on Asbestos and Other Toxic Particulates, and Interdepartmental Center for Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces (NIS), University of Torino , Via P. Giuria 7, 10125 Torino, Italy.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2015 Jan 20;28(1):87-91. doi: 10.1021/tx500366a. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
In the course of studies of the interaction of proteins with TiO2 nanoparticles, we have investigated the role of the medium employed in cellular tests, by measuring the variation of ζ-potential vs pH in the range 2-9 and bovine serum albumin adsorption on TiO2 P25 in the presence of either HEPES or PBS as buffers, both mimicking the physiological pH, but with different chemical nature. The two buffers yield remarkably dissimilar surface charges and protein uptake, i.e., they impart different surface characteristics to the particles which could affect the contact with cells or tissues. This may account for dissimilar toxicological outcomes among in vitro tests and particularly between in vitro vs in vivo tests, considering the high amount of phosphate ions present in body fluids.
在蛋白质与二氧化钛纳米颗粒相互作用的研究过程中,我们通过测量2-9范围内ζ电位随pH的变化以及在作为缓冲剂的HEPES或PBS存在下牛血清白蛋白在TiO₂ P25上的吸附情况,研究了细胞测试中所用介质的作用。这两种缓冲剂都模拟生理pH,但化学性质不同。两种缓冲剂产生的表面电荷和蛋白质摄取量明显不同,即它们赋予颗粒不同的表面特性,这可能会影响与细胞或组织的接触。考虑到体液中存在大量磷酸根离子,可以解释体外测试之间,尤其是体外与体内测试之间不同的毒理学结果。