Yin Junmei, Yeung Roseanne, Luk Andrea, Tutino Greg, Zhang Yuying, Kong Alice, Chung Harriet, Wong Rebecca, Ozaki Risa, Ma Ronald, Tsang Chiu-Chi, Tong Peter, So Wingyee, Chan Juliana
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Asia Diabetes Foundation, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
J Diabetes. 2016 Jan;8(1):109-19. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12262. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
Factors associated with persistent poor glycemic control were explored in patients with type 2 diabetes under the Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation (JADE) program.
Chinese adults enrolled in JADE with HbA1c ≥8% at initial comprehensive assessment (CA1) and repeat assessment were analyzed. The improved group was defined as those with a ≥1% absolute reduction in HbA1c, and the unimproved group was those with <1% reduction at the repeat CA (CA2).
Of 4458 enrolled patients with HbA1c ≥8% at baseline, 1450 underwent repeat CA. After a median interval of 1.7 years (interquartile range[IQR] 1.1-2.2) between CA1 and CA2, the unimproved group (n = 677) had a mean 0.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3%, 0.5%) increase in HbA1c compared with a mean 2.8% reduction (95% CI -2.9, -2.6%) in the improved group (n = 773). The unimproved group had a female preponderance with lower education level, and was more likely to be insulin treated. Patients in the improved group received more diabetes education between CAs with improved self-care behaviors, whereas the unimproved group had worsening of health-related quality of life at CA2. Apart from female gender, long disease duration, low educational level, obesity, retinopathy, history of hypoglycemia, and insulin use, lack of education from diabetes nurses between CAs had the strongest association for persistent poor glycemic control.
These results highlight the multidimensional nature of glycemic control, and the importance of diabetes education and optimizing diabetes care by considering psychosocial factors.
在亚洲糖尿病联合评估(JADE)项目下,对2型糖尿病患者中与血糖控制持续不佳相关的因素进行了探索。
分析了在JADE项目中初始综合评估(CA1)时糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≥8%且进行了重复评估的中国成年人。改善组定义为HbA1c绝对降低≥1%的患者,未改善组定义为在重复CA(CA2)时降低<1%的患者。
在4458例基线时HbA1c≥8%的入组患者中,1450例进行了重复CA。在CA1和CA2之间的中位间隔时间为1.7年(四分位间距[IQR]为1.1 - 2.2)后,未改善组(n = 677)的HbA1c平均升高0.4%(95%置信区间[CI] 0.3%,0.5%),而改善组(n = 773)的HbA1c平均降低2.8%(95% CI -2.9,-2.6%)。未改善组女性居多,教育水平较低,且更可能接受胰岛素治疗。改善组的患者在两次CA之间接受了更多糖尿病教育,自我护理行为有所改善,而未改善组在CA2时健康相关生活质量恶化。除了女性性别、病程长、教育水平低、肥胖、视网膜病变、低血糖史和胰岛素使用外,两次CA之间缺乏糖尿病护士的教育与血糖控制持续不佳的关联最强。
这些结果突出了血糖控制的多维度性质,以及考虑社会心理因素进行糖尿病教育和优化糖尿病护理的重要性。