Suppr超能文献

普瑞巴林治疗疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变及行走疼痛患者的疗效与安全性。

Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin in the Treatment of Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy and Pain on Walking.

作者信息

Huffman Cynthia, Stacey Brett R, Tuchman Michael, Burbridge Claire, Li Chunming, Parsons Bruce, Pauer Lynne, Scavone Joseph M, Behar Regina, Yurkewicz Lorraine

机构信息

*Meridien Research, Tampa, FL †Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR ‡Palm Beach Neurological Center, Palm Beach Gardens, FL §Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, Surrey, UK ∥Pfizer Inc., New York, NY ¶Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2015 Nov;31(11):946-58. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000198.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 2-period crossover study (two 6-week treatment periods separated by a 2-week washout period) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pregabalin (150 to 300 mg/d) for treatment of pain and pain on walking in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) who experienced pain while walking.

METHODS

Co-primary efficacy endpoints were: (1) mean pain score (last 7 daily pain diary scores, 0 to 10 numeric rating scale at end of each treatment period) and (2) DPN pain on walking (0 to 10 numeric rating scale immediately after walking 50 feet [15.2 m] on flat surface). Secondary endpoints included other pain parameters, patient-reported sleep, health-related quality of life, and safety measures.

RESULTS

Two hundred three patients were treated (pregabalin, n=198; placebo, n=186), with no statistically significant treatment difference for pregabalin versus placebo in the co-primary efficacy endpoints, mean DPN pain (P=0.0656) and mean DPN pain on walking (P=0.412). A carryover effect was observed. Analysis of co-primary endpoints for period 1 showed significant treatment difference for DPN pain (P=0.034) and DPN pain on walking (P=0.001). Treatment with pregabalin resulted in significant improvements versus placebo on prespecified patient global impression of change (end of period 1; P=0.002), and sleep interference rating scale (end of period 2; P=0.011). Adverse events were more frequent with pregabalin than with placebo and caused discontinuation in 13 (6.6%) pregabalin patients versus 5 (2.7%) placebo patients.

DISCUSSION

Failure to meet the co-primary objectives may be related to carryover effect from period 1 to period 2, lower pregabalin dose (150 to 300 mg/d), and/or placebo response in painful DPN.

摘要

目的

本随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心、两阶段交叉研究(两个为期6周的治疗阶段,中间间隔2周的洗脱期)评估了普瑞巴林(150至300mg/天)治疗伴有行走时疼痛的疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)患者疼痛及行走时疼痛的疗效和安全性。

方法

共同主要疗效终点为:(1)平均疼痛评分(每个治疗阶段结束时最后7天每日疼痛日记评分,0至10数字评分量表)和(2)行走时DPN疼痛(在平坦表面行走50英尺[15.2米]后立即使用0至10数字评分量表)。次要终点包括其他疼痛参数、患者报告的睡眠、健康相关生活质量和安全指标。

结果

203例患者接受治疗(普瑞巴林组,n = 198;安慰剂组,n = 186),在共同主要疗效终点方面,普瑞巴林与安慰剂相比无统计学显著治疗差异,即平均DPN疼痛(P = 0.0656)和平均行走时DPN疼痛(P = 0.412)。观察到有遗留效应。对第1阶段共同主要终点的分析显示,DPN疼痛(P = 0.034)和行走时DPN疼痛(P = 0.001)有显著治疗差异。与安慰剂相比,普瑞巴林治疗在预先指定的患者总体变化印象(第1阶段结束时;P = 0.002)和睡眠干扰评分量表(第2阶段结束时;P = 0.011)方面有显著改善。普瑞巴林组不良事件比安慰剂组更频繁,导致13例(6.6%)普瑞巴林患者停药,而安慰剂组为5例(2.7%)。

讨论

未达到共同主要目标可能与从第1阶段到第2阶段的遗留效应、普瑞巴林剂量较低(150至300mg/天)和/或疼痛性DPN中的安慰剂反应有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验