Liampas Andreas, Rekatsina Martina, Vadalouca Athina, Paladini Antonella, Varrassi Giustino, Zis Panagiotis
Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Whipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):55-68. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00210-3. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
Peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) arises either acutely or in the chronic phase of a lesion or disease of the peripheral nervous system and is associated with a notable disease burden. The management of PNP is often challenging. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate current evidence, derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have assessed pharmacological interventions for the treatment of PNP due to polyneuropathy (PN).
A systematic search of the PubMed database led to the identification of 538 papers, of which 457 were excluded due to not meeting the eligibility criteria, and two articles were identified through screening of the reference lists of the 81 eligible studies. Ultimately, 83 papers were included in this systematic review.
The best available evidence for the management of painful diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is for amitriptyline, duloxetine, gabapentin, pregabalin and venlafaxine as monotherapies and oxycodone as add-on therapy (level II of evidence). Tramadol appears to be effective when used as a monotherapy and add-on therapy in patients with PN of various etiologies (level II of evidence). Weaker evidence (level III) is available on the effectiveness of several other agents discussed in this review for the management of PNP due to PN.
Response to treatment may be affected by the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms that are involved in the pathogenesis of the PN and, therefore, it is very important to thoroughly investigate patients presenting with PNP to determine the causes of this neuropathy. Future RCTs should be conducted to shed more light on the use of pharmacological approaches in patients with other forms of PNP and to design specific treatment algorithms.
周围神经性疼痛(PNP)可急性发作,也可在周围神经系统病变或疾病的慢性期出现,且与显著的疾病负担相关。PNP的管理通常具有挑战性。本系统评价的目的是评估来自随机对照试验(RCT)的现有证据,这些试验评估了用于治疗多发性神经病(PN)所致PNP的药物干预措施。
对PubMed数据库进行系统检索,共识别出538篇论文,其中457篇因不符合纳入标准而被排除,通过筛选81项符合条件研究的参考文献列表又识别出2篇文章。最终,83篇论文被纳入本系统评价。
治疗疼痛性糖尿病性多发性神经病(DPN)的最佳现有证据表明,阿米替林、度洛西汀、加巴喷丁、普瑞巴林和文拉法辛作为单一疗法有效,羟考酮作为附加疗法有效(证据等级为II级)。曲马多在各种病因所致PN患者中作为单一疗法和附加疗法使用时似乎有效(证据等级为II级)。本综述中讨论的其他几种药物用于治疗PN所致PNP的有效性证据较弱(证据等级为III级)。
对治疗的反应可能受PN发病机制中潜在病理生理机制的影响,因此,对PNP患者进行全面调查以确定这种神经病的病因非常重要。未来应开展RCT,以更深入了解药物治疗方法在其他形式PNP患者中的应用,并设计特定的治疗方案。