Raskin Philip, Huffman Cynthia, Yurkewicz Lorraine, Pauer Lynne, Scavone Joseph M, Yang Ruoyong, Parsons Bruce
*Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX †Meridien Research, Tampa, FL ‡Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT §Pfizer Inc., New York, NY.
Clin J Pain. 2016 Mar;32(3):203-10. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000254.
To evaluate pregabalin's efficacy and safety versus placebo to reduce pain in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) using a concomitant nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.
In a randomized, double-masked, 14-week, 2-period, crossover study, patients with painful DPN using a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for non-DPN-related pain received 150 to 300 mg/d pregabalin or placebo (period 1); 14-day washout; then, the opposite therapy (period 2). Endpoints included weekly change in DPN pain score, sleep interference, adverse events, and patient-reported outcomes.
Patients with similar baseline characteristics were randomized (period 1) to 1 of the 2 following possible sequences: pregabalin→placebo (n=154) or placebo→pregabalin (n=147). Results of the primary efficacy measure, mean weekly DPN pain at endpoint, showed no significant difference between pregabalin and placebo. However, 1 sensitivity analysis (mixed-model repeated measures) found greater pain score reductions with pregabalin than placebo at weeks 2 to 4 and overall (all P<0.05). One secondary endpoint analysis, mean treatment difference in DPN-related sleep interference, favored pregabalin over placebo (P=0.0009). Other sensitivity and secondary analyses were nonsignificant. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of pregabalin.
Pregabalin (vs. placebo) showed overall improvements in sleep, pain reduction in 1 sensitivity analysis, and was well tolerated. Potential factors that may have confounded the ability to detect a treatment difference in DPN pain reduction (high placebo response, carryover effect, short washout period, or pregabalin dose) are discussed in the context of future studies.
在使用非甾体抗炎药的同时,评估普瑞巴林与安慰剂相比在减轻糖尿病性周围神经病变(DPN)患者疼痛方面的疗效和安全性。
在一项随机、双盲、为期14周的两阶段交叉研究中,使用非甾体抗炎药治疗非DPN相关疼痛的疼痛性DPN患者接受150至300mg/d的普瑞巴林或安慰剂治疗(第1阶段);为期14天的洗脱期;然后接受相反的治疗(第2阶段)。终点指标包括DPN疼痛评分的每周变化、睡眠干扰、不良事件以及患者报告的结局。
具有相似基线特征的患者被随机分配(第1阶段)至以下两种可能顺序中的一种:普瑞巴林→安慰剂(n = 154)或安慰剂→普瑞巴林(n = 147)。主要疗效指标的结果,即终点时每周平均DPN疼痛,显示普瑞巴林和安慰剂之间无显著差异。然而,一项敏感性分析(混合模型重复测量)发现,在第2至4周以及总体上,普瑞巴林组的疼痛评分降低幅度大于安慰剂组(所有P<0.05)。一项次要终点分析,即DPN相关睡眠干扰的平均治疗差异,显示普瑞巴林优于安慰剂(P = 0.0009)。其他敏感性和次要分析无显著意义。治疗中出现的不良事件与普瑞巴林已知的安全性特征一致。
普瑞巴林(与安慰剂相比)在睡眠方面总体有所改善,在一项敏感性分析中疼痛减轻,且耐受性良好。在未来研究的背景下,讨论了可能混淆检测DPN疼痛减轻治疗差异能力的潜在因素(高安慰剂反应、残留效应、洗脱期短或普瑞巴林剂量)。