Kwon Jee Young, Koedrith Preeyaporn, Seo Young Rok
Department of Life Science, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Dongguk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Faculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol University, Phuttamonthon District, NakhonPathom, Thailand.
Int J Nanomedicine. 2014 Dec 15;9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):271-86. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S57918. eCollection 2014.
Engineered nanoparticles (NPs) are widely used in many sectors, such as food, medicine, military, and sport, but their unique characteristics may cause deleterious health effects. Close attention is being paid to metal NP genotoxicity; however, NP genotoxic/carcinogenic effects and the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. In this review, we address some metal and metal oxide NPs of interest and current genotoxicity tests in vitro and in vivo. Metal NPs can cause DNA damage such as chromosomal aberrations, DNA strand breaks, oxidative DNA damage, and mutations. We also discuss several parameters that may affect genotoxic response, including physicochemical properties, widely used assays/end point tests, and experimental conditions. Although potential biomarkers of nanogenotoxicity or carcinogenicity are suggested, inconsistent findings in the literature render results inconclusive due to a variety of factors. Advantages and limitations related to different methods for investigating genotoxicity are described, and future directions and recommendations for better understanding genotoxic potential are addressed.
工程纳米颗粒(NPs)广泛应用于食品、医药、军事和体育等许多领域,但其独特特性可能会对健康产生有害影响。人们正密切关注金属纳米颗粒的遗传毒性;然而,纳米颗粒的遗传毒性/致癌作用及其潜在机制仍有待阐明。在本综述中,我们探讨了一些相关的金属和金属氧化物纳米颗粒以及当前的体外和体内遗传毒性测试。金属纳米颗粒可导致DNA损伤,如染色体畸变、DNA链断裂、氧化性DNA损伤和突变。我们还讨论了可能影响遗传毒性反应的几个参数,包括物理化学性质、广泛使用的检测方法/终点测试以及实验条件。尽管有人提出了纳米遗传毒性或致癌性的潜在生物标志物,但由于多种因素,文献中的不一致结果使得结论尚无定论。描述了与不同遗传毒性研究方法相关的优缺点,并探讨了更好地理解遗传毒性潜力的未来方向和建议。