From the Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM U970, Paris, France (M.M., R.B., M.T., K.N., X.J., E.M.); Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.M., A.A.H., X.J., E.M.); Cardiology Department, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France (M.M., A.A.H., X.J., E.M.); Cardiology and Development, Paris, France (M.M., X.J., E.M.); Agence Sanitaire et Sociale de Nouvelle Calédonie, Nouméa, New Caledonia (C.R., B.H., P.C., J.-M.M., B.R.); Département de l'Action Sanitaire de Sociale des Iles Loyaté, Wé, Lifou, New Caledonia (I.d.F.); Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (K.N.); and Centre Hospitalier Territorial de Nouvelle Calédonie, Nouméa, New Caledonia (B.N.).
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002324.
Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major public health problem worldwide. Although early diagnosis by echocardiography may potentially play a key role in developing active surveillance, systematic evaluation of simple approaches in resource poor settings are needed.
We prospectively compared focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) to a reference approach for RHD screening in a school children population. FCU included (1) the use of a pocket-sized echocardiography machine, (2) nonexpert staff (2 nurses with specific training), and (3) a simplified set of echocardiographic criteria. The reference approach used standardized echocardiographic examination, reviewed by an expert cardiologist, according to 2012 World Heart Federation criteria. Among the 6 different echocardiographic criteria, first tested in a preliminary phase, mitral regurgitation jet length≥2 cm or any aortic regurgitation was considered best suited to be FCU criteria. Of the 1217 subjects enrolled (mean, 9.6±1 years; 49.6% male), 49 (4%) were diagnosed with RHD by the reference approach. The sensitivity of FCU for the detection of RHD was 83.7% (95% confidence interval, 73.3-94.0) for nurse A and 77.6% (95% confidence interval, 65.9-89.2) for nurse B. FCU yielded a specificity of 90.9% (95% confidence interval, 89.3-92.6) and 92.0% (95% confidence interval, 90.4-93.5) according to users. Percentage of agreement among nurses was 91.4%.
FCU by nonexperts using pocket devices seems feasible and yields acceptable sensitivity and specificity for RHD detection when compared with the state-of-the-art approach, thereby opening new perspectives for mass screening for RHD in low-resource settings.
风湿性心脏病(RHD)仍然是全球的一个主要公共卫生问题。尽管超声心动图的早期诊断可能在制定主动监测方面发挥关键作用,但在资源匮乏的环境中,需要对简单方法进行系统评估。
我们前瞻性地比较了聚焦式心脏超声(FCU)与 RHD 筛查的参考方法在学童人群中的应用。FCU 包括:(1)使用袖珍式超声心动图机;(2)非专业人员(2 名接受过专门培训的护士);(3)简化的超声心动图标准。参考方法使用标准化的超声心动图检查,由专家心脏病专家根据 2012 年世界心脏联合会标准进行评估。在 6 种不同的超声心动图标准中,首先在初步阶段进行了测试,其中二尖瓣反流射流长度≥2cm 或任何主动脉瓣反流被认为最适合作为 FCU 标准。在纳入的 1217 名受试者中(平均年龄为 9.6±1 岁,49.6%为男性),49 名(4%)被参考方法诊断为 RHD。护士 A 和护士 B 的 FCU 检测 RHD 的敏感性分别为 83.7%(95%置信区间,73.3-94.0)和 77.6%(95%置信区间,65.9-89.2)。根据使用者的不同,FCU 的特异性分别为 90.9%(95%置信区间,89.3-92.6)和 92.0%(95%置信区间,90.4-93.5)。护士之间的一致性百分比为 91.4%。
使用袖珍设备的非专业人员进行 FCU 似乎是可行的,并且与最先进的方法相比,在检测 RHD 方面具有可接受的敏感性和特异性,从而为资源匮乏地区的 RHD 大规模筛查开辟了新的前景。