Ploutz Michelle, Lu Jimmy C, Scheel Janet, Webb Catherine, Ensing Greg J, Aliku Twalib, Lwabi Peter, Sable Craig, Beaton Andrea
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's National Health System, Washington DC, USA.
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Heart. 2016 Jan;102(1):35-9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308236. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
Handheld echocardiography (HAND) has good sensitivity and specificity for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) when performed by cardiologists. However, physician shortages in RHD-endemic areas demand less-skilled users to make RHD screening practical. We examine nurse performance and interpretation of HAND using a simplified approach for RHD screening.
Two nurses received training on HAND and a simplified screening approach. Consented students at two schools in Uganda were eligible for participation. A simplified approach (HAND performed and interpreted by a non-expert) was compared with the reference standard (standard portable echocardiography, performed and interpreted by experts according to the 2012 World Heart Federation guidelines). Reasons for false-positive and false-negative HAND studies were identified.
A total of 1002 children were consented, with 956 (11.1 years, 41.8% male) having complete data for review. Diagnoses included: 913 (95.5%) children were classified normal, 32 (3.3%) borderline RHD and 11 (1.2%) definite RHD. The simplified approach had a sensitivity of 74.4% (58.8% to 86.5%) and a specificity of 78.8% (76.0% to 81.4%) for any RHD (borderline and definite). Sensitivity improved to 90.9% (58.7% to 98.5%) for definite RHD. Identification and measurement of erroneous colour jets was the most common reason for false-positive studies (n=164/194), while missed mitral regurgitation and shorter regurgitant jet lengths with HAND were the most common reasons for false-negative studies (n=10/11).
Non-expert-led HAND screening programmes offer a potential solution to financial and workforce barriers that limit widespread RHD screening. Nurses trained on HAND using a simplified approach had reasonable sensitivity and specificity for RHD screening. Information on reasons for false-negative and false-positive screening studies should be used to inform future training protocols, which could lead to improved screening performance.
由心脏病专家操作时,手持式超声心动图(HAND)对风湿性心脏病(RHD)具有良好的敏感性和特异性。然而,RHD流行地区医生短缺,需要技能较低的使用者来开展RHD筛查工作。我们采用一种简化的RHD筛查方法,研究护士使用HAND的操作情况及解读结果。
两名护士接受了HAND及简化筛查方法的培训。乌干达两所学校中同意参与的学生符合参与条件。将简化方法(由非专家操作并解读HAND)与参考标准(标准便携式超声心动图,由专家根据2012年世界心脏联盟指南操作并解读)进行比较。确定HAND检查出现假阳性和假阴性结果的原因。
共有1002名儿童同意参与,其中956名(11.1岁,41.8%为男性)有完整数据可供分析。诊断结果包括:913名(95.5%)儿童被分类为正常,32名(3.3%)为临界RHD,11名(1.2%)为确诊RHD。对于任何RHD(临界和确诊),简化方法的敏感性为74.4%(58.8%至86.5%),特异性为78.8%(76.0%至81.4%)。对于确诊RHD,敏感性提高到90.9%(58.7%至98.5%)。识别和测量错误的彩色血流束是假阳性检查最常见的原因(n = 164/194),而漏诊二尖瓣反流以及HAND检查时反流束长度较短是假阴性检查最常见的原因(n = 10/11)。
由非专家主导的HAND筛查项目为限制RHD广泛筛查的资金和人力障碍提供了一个潜在的解决方案。使用简化方法接受HAND培训的护士在RHD筛查中具有合理的敏感性和特异性。关于假阴性和假阳性筛查检查原因的信息应用于为未来的培训方案提供参考,这可能会提高筛查性能。