Brown Sam P, Fredrik Inglis R, Taddei François
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford South Parks Road, Oxford, UK.
University of Paris, Faculty of Medicine INSERM, U571, Paris, France.
Evol Appl. 2009 Feb;2(1):32-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00059.x. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
Invading an occupied niche is a formidable ecological challenge, and one of particular human importance in the context of food-borne microbial pathogens. We discuss distinct categories of invader-triggered environmental change that facilitate invasion by emptying their niche of competitors. Evidence is reviewed that gut bacteria use such strategies to manipulate their environment (via bacteriocins, temperate phage viruses or immuno-manipulation) at the expense of their competitors are reviewed. The possible virulence implications of microbial warfare among multiple co-infecting strains are diverse. Killing competitors can reduce virulence by reducing overall microbial densities, or increase virulence if for example the allelopathic mechanism involves immuno-manipulation. Finally, we place microbial anti-competitor strategies in a social evolution framework, highlighting how costly anti-competitor strategies can be understood as examples of microbial spite. We conclude by discussing other invasive species that have also developed such proactive strategies of invasion.
侵入一个已被占据的生态位是一项艰巨的生态挑战,在食源微生物病原体的背景下,这对人类尤为重要。我们讨论了不同类型的入侵者引发的环境变化,这些变化通过清空其生态位中的竞争者来促进入侵。我们回顾了相关证据,即肠道细菌利用此类策略(通过细菌素、温和噬菌体病毒或免疫操纵)来操纵其环境,而这是以其竞争者为代价的。多种共感染菌株之间的微生物战争可能对毒力产生的影响是多样的。杀死竞争者可以通过降低总体微生物密度来降低毒力,或者如果化感机制涉及免疫操纵,则可能增加毒力。最后,我们将微生物的抗竞争策略置于社会进化框架中,强调了代价高昂的抗竞争策略如何可以被理解为微生物恶意行为的例子。我们通过讨论其他也已发展出此类主动入侵策略的入侵物种来结束本文。