• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留筋膜的筋膜内保留神经机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术及解剖性膀胱尿道吻合术:技术要点

Fascia-sparing intrafascial nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and anatomic vesicourethral anastomosis: point of technique.

作者信息

Tasci Ali Ihsan, Simsek Abdulmuttalip, Torer Bugra Dogukan, Sokmen Dogukan, Sahin Selcuk, Tugcu Volkan

出版信息

Arch Esp Urol. 2014 Nov;67(9):731-9.

PMID:25568908
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomies provide excellent control of cancer, but the recovery of continence and sexual function are uncertain. We report the operative details and surgical techniques of a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) experiences for organ confined prostate cancer.

METHODS

Between the years of 2009 and 2012, 68 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent fascia-sparing intrafascial nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and anatomic vesicourethral anastomosis. None of the patients were incontinent. 48 of them had an IIEF-5 potency score equal or greater than 22, without receiving phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Our techniques included preservation of the bladder neck, preservation of the endopelvic fascia and puboprostatic ligaments, a nerve-sparing intrafascial approach, selective suturing of the dorsal venous complex, and anterior and posterior reconstruction. We evaluated the patients at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th postoperative months to determine if these techniques are correlated with early recovery of urinary continence and potency.

RESULTS

The mean operation time was 258.2±78.5 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 111.2±22.9 cc during the operation. A nerve-sparing procedure was performed bilaterally in 62 (91.2 %) cases and unilaterally in 6 (8.8%) cases. The mean drain extraction time was 2.3±0.9 days, and the mean hospital stay was 3.4±1.1 days. The catheter was removed on postoperative day 9.9±0.9. The surgical margin was positive in 10 (14.7%) patients. The continence rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 74.2%, 76.9%, 80.6%, and 95.6%, respectively. During the same period, among the patients without ED, the potency rates were 29.4%, 38.2%, 54.1%, and 75%, respectively All operations were completed successfully, and there were no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

A more comprehensive approach for reporting prostate cancer surgery outcomes is needed. Our study findings suggest that fascia-sparing techniques positively influence the early recovery of urinary continence. However, randomized controlled trials with large samples are needed.

摘要

目的

保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术能有效控制癌症,但控尿和性功能的恢复情况尚不确定。我们报告了机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)治疗局限性前列腺癌的手术细节和技术经验。

方法

2009年至2012年间,68例临床局限性前列腺癌患者接受了保留筋膜的筋膜内保留神经机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术及解剖性膀胱尿道吻合术。所有患者均无尿失禁。其中48例国际勃起功能指数-5(IIEF-5)评分等于或高于22,且未接受磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂治疗。我们的技术包括保留膀胱颈、保留盆腔内筋膜和耻骨前列腺韧带、保留神经的筋膜内入路、选择性缝合背深静脉复合体以及前后重建。我们在术后第1、3、6和12个月对患者进行评估,以确定这些技术是否与早期控尿和性功能恢复相关。

结果

手术平均时间为258.2±78.5分钟,术中平均估计失血量为111.2±22.9毫升。62例(91.2%)患者双侧进行了保留神经手术,6例(8.8%)患者单侧进行了保留神经手术。平均引流管拔除时间为2.3±0.9天,平均住院时间为3.4±1.1天。术后第9.9±0.9天拔除导尿管。10例(14.7%)患者手术切缘阳性。1、3、6和12个月时的控尿率分别为74.2%、76.9%、80.6%和95.6%。同期,在无勃起功能障碍的患者中,性功能恢复率分别为29.4%、38.2%、54.1%和75%。所有手术均成功完成,无重大并发症。

结论

需要一种更全面的方法来报告前列腺癌手术结果。我们的研究结果表明,保留筋膜技术对早期控尿恢复有积极影响。然而,需要进行大样本的随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Fascia-sparing intrafascial nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and anatomic vesicourethral anastomosis: point of technique.保留筋膜的筋膜内保留神经机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术及解剖性膀胱尿道吻合术:技术要点
Arch Esp Urol. 2014 Nov;67(9):731-9.
2
Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of transperitoneal robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: single centre's experience.经腹机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学结果、功能结局及并发症发生率:单中心经验
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Mar;39(2):70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 May 22.
3
Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.改良横纹肌括约肌重建对机器人辅助前列腺根治术后早期控尿功能恢复和吻合口漏发生率的影响。
Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
4
Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial.机器人辅助前列腺根治术中的高级膀胱尿道支撑重建(ARVUS):一项两臂随机对照试验的一年功能结局。
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):822-830. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
5
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Novel Urethral Fixation Technique Versus Standard Vesicourethral Anastomosis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术采用新型尿道固定技术与标准膀胱尿道吻合术的比较。
Eur Urol. 2021 Apr;79(4):530-536. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.028. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
A matched-pair comparison between bilateral intrafascial and interfascial nerve-sparing techniques in extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.双侧筋膜内与筋膜间神经保留技术在腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺根治术中的配对比较。
Asian J Androl. 2013 Jul;15(4):513-7. doi: 10.1038/aja.2012.157. Epub 2013 May 27.
7
Anatomic and technical considerations for optimizing recovery of urinary function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术优化尿功能恢复的解剖学和技术考虑因素。
Curr Opin Urol. 2013 Jan;23(1):78-87. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835b0ae5.
8
Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)期间进行的神经保留类型的病理确认。
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):451-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11393.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
9
Continence outcomes after bladder neck preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中保留膀胱颈后的控尿结果。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24(6):364-71. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2015.1027711. Epub 2015 Mar 22.
10
Optimizing Nerve Sparing in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Investigation of Traditional and Modified Endopelvic Fascia Preservation Techniques.优化机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的神经保留:传统与改良盆腔筋膜保留技术的对比研究
Acta Inform Med. 2023;32(1):76-81. doi: 10.5455/aim.2024.32.76-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.经会阴前列腺根治性切除术与机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局比较。
Updates Surg. 2023 Jun;75(4):1027-1035. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01453-3. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy-a Contemporary Review.微创根治性前列腺切除术的结果——当代综述
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):580-588. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01125-3. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Immediate Continence Rates in RALRP: A Comparison of Three Techniques.
机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的即时控尿率:三种技术的比较
JSLS. 2016 Oct-Dec;20(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00058.