Suppr超能文献

对治疗不充分的动脉高血压患者进行3个月远程血压干预的长期效果

Long-term effects of 3-month telemetric blood pressure intervention in patients with inadequately treated arterial hypertension.

作者信息

Neumann Claas L, Menne Jan, Schettler Volker, Hagenah Gerrit C, Brockes Christiane, Haller Hermann, Schulz Egbert G

机构信息

1 Center of Nephrology Goettingen , Goettingen, Germany .

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2015 Mar;21(3):145-50. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0058. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We have shown that better blood pressure (BP) control can be achieved by using 3-month telemetric BP measurement (TBPM) in comparison with a standard-care control group (C-G). The present analysis should clarify if this will also lead to a better middle- and long-term BP control.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Fifty-seven patients finished the main study. After the 3 months no TBPM was performed. For 40 patients, 18 from the TBPM group (TBPM-G) and 22 from the C-G, we obtained ambulant BP measurements (ABPMs) with a mean follow-up of 20 months. Seventeen patients were lost to follow-up. BP target values were defined as ABPM ≤130/80 or ≤125/75 mm Hg with diabetes or renal failure.

RESULTS

At the end of the follow-up, the systolic BP was 121.2±11.2 mm Hg in TBPM-G and 130.7±10.4 mm Hg in C-G, and the diastolic BP was 72.8±10.9 versus 77.0±7.1 mm Hg, respectively. Fifty-six percent in TBPM-G versus 40% in C-G (p=0.024) had a controlled BP as defined by ABPM criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

TBPM helps achieve BP target values in patients with previously inadequately treated arterial hypertension, and the benefit is sustained. Beyond its immediate application, in comparison with standard treatment, TBPM allows for a better BP adjustment in the long term as well.

摘要

背景与目的

我们已经表明,与标准护理对照组(C-G)相比,使用3个月的远程血压测量(TBPM)可以实现更好的血压(BP)控制。本分析旨在阐明这是否也会带来更好的中长期血压控制。

对象与方法

57名患者完成了主要研究。3个月后未进行TBPM。对于40名患者,其中18名来自TBPM组(TBPM-G),22名来自C-G组,我们获得了动态血压测量(ABPM),平均随访20个月。17名患者失访。血压目标值定义为ABPM≤130/80或糖尿病或肾衰竭患者≤125/75mmHg。

结果

随访结束时,TBPM-G组的收缩压为121.2±11.2mmHg,C-G组为130.7±10.4mmHg,舒张压分别为72.8±10.9mmHg和77.0±7.1mmHg。根据ABPM标准,TBPM-G组56%的患者血压得到控制,C-G组为40%(p=0.024)。

结论

TBPM有助于先前治疗不充分的动脉高血压患者达到血压目标值,且这种益处持续存在。与标准治疗相比,除了其即时应用外,TBPM长期也能实现更好的血压调整。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验