Suppr超能文献

在逼真头部模型中电休克治疗和磁惊厥治疗的刺激强度与聚焦性

Stimulation strength and focality of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy in a realistic head model.

作者信息

Lee Won Hee, Lisanby Sarah H, Laine Andrew F, Peterchev Angel V

出版信息

Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:410-3. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6943615.

Abstract

This study examines the characteristics of the electric field (E-field) induced in the brain by electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and magnetic seizure therapy (MST). The electric field induced by five ECT electrode configurations (bilateral, bifrontal, right unilateral, focal electrically administered seizure therapy, and frontomedial) as well as an MST coil configuration (circular) was computed in an anatomically realistic finite element model of the human head. We computed the maps of the electric field strength relative to an estimated neural activation threshold, and used them to evaluate the stimulation strength and focality of the various ECT and MST paradigms. The results show that the median ECT stimulation strength in the brain is 3-11 times higher than that for MST, and that the stimulated brain volume is substantially higher with ECT (47-100%) than with MST (21%). Our study provides insight into the observed reduction of cognitive side effects in MST compared to ECT, and supports arguments for lowering ECT current amplitude as a means of curbing its side effects.

摘要

本研究考察了电休克疗法(ECT)和磁休克疗法(MST)在大脑中诱发的电场(E场)的特征。在一个具有解剖学真实感的人体头部有限元模型中,计算了五种ECT电极配置(双侧、双额、右侧单侧、局灶性电惊厥治疗和额内侧)以及一种MST线圈配置(圆形)所诱发的电场。我们计算了相对于估计的神经激活阈值的电场强度图,并用它们来评估各种ECT和MST范式的刺激强度和聚焦性。结果表明,大脑中ECT刺激强度的中位数比MST高3至11倍,并且ECT刺激的脑体积(47 - 100%)比MST(21%)大得多。我们的研究为观察到的与ECT相比MST认知副作用减少提供了见解,并支持降低ECT电流幅度作为抑制其副作用手段的观点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验