Sahlem Gregory L, Short E Baron, Kerns Suzanne, Snipes Jon, DeVries William, Fox James B, Burns Carol, Schmidt Matthew, Nahas Ziad H, George Mark S, Sackeim Harold A
From the *Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Departments of †Psychiatry and ‡Radiology, Columbia University, New York, NY; §Department of Psychiatry, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; and ∥Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC.
J ECT. 2016 Sep;32(3):197-203. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000328.
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most rapid and effective antidepressant treatment but with concerns about cognitive adverse effects. A new form of ECT, focal electrically administered seizure therapy (FEAST), was designed to increase the focality of stimulation and better match stimulus parameters with neurophysiology. We recently reported on the safety and feasibility of FEAST in a cohort (n = 17) of depressed patients. We now report on the safety, feasibility, preliminary efficacy, and cognitive effects of FEAST in a new cohort.
Open-label FEAST was administered to 20 depressed adults (6 men; 3 with bipolar disorder; age 49.1 ± 10.6 years). Clinical and cognitive assessments were obtained at baseline and end of course. Time to orientation recovery was assessed at each treatment. Nonresponders switched to conventional ECT.
Participants tolerated the treatment well with no dropouts. Five patients (25%) transitioned from FEAST to conventional ECT due to inadequate response. After FEAST (mean, 9.3 ± 3.5 sessions; range, 4-14), there was a 58.1% ± 36.0% improvement in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores compared with that in the baseline (P < 0.0001); 13 (65%) of 20 patients met response criteria, and 11 (55%) of 20 met remission criteria. Patients achieved reorientation (4 of 5 items) in 4.4 ± 3.0 minutes (median, 4.5 minutes), timed from eyes opening. There was no deterioration in neuropsychological measures.
These findings provide further support for the safety and efficacy of FEAST. The remission and response rates were in the range found using conventional ECT, and the time to reorientation may be quicker. However, without a randomized comparison group, conclusions are tentative.
电休克治疗(ECT)是最快速有效的抗抑郁治疗方法,但人们担心其会产生认知不良反应。一种新型的ECT,即局部电刺激癫痫治疗(FEAST),旨在增强刺激的局部性,并使刺激参数更好地与神经生理学相匹配。我们最近报告了FEAST在一组(n = 17)抑郁症患者中的安全性和可行性。我们现在报告FEAST在一个新队列中的安全性、可行性、初步疗效和认知影响。
对20名成年抑郁症患者(6名男性;3名双相情感障碍患者;年龄49.1±10.6岁)进行开放标签的FEAST治疗。在基线和疗程结束时进行临床和认知评估。每次治疗时评估定向恢复时间。无反应者改用传统ECT。
参与者对治疗耐受性良好,无脱落病例。5名患者(25%)因反应不足从FEAST转为传统ECT。接受FEAST治疗后(平均9.3±3.5次治疗;范围4 - 14次),汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分较基线提高了58.1%±36.0%(P < 0.0001);20名患者中有13名(65%)达到反应标准,20名患者中有11名(55%)达到缓解标准。患者从睁眼开始计时,在4.4±3.0分钟(中位数4.5分钟)内实现重新定向(5项中的4项)。神经心理学测量指标没有恶化。
这些发现为FEAST的安全性和有效性提供了进一步支持。缓解率和反应率与使用传统ECT时的范围相当,重新定向时间可能更快。然而,由于没有随机对照组,结论具有不确定性。